Influence of Opacifiers and Different Dentin Thicknesses on the Optical Properties of a Darkened Teeth with Limited Sound Tissue Reduction.

Camila Sobral Sampaio, Pablo J Atria, Lisette Aguilera, Hugo Bravo Darrouy, João L B Abreu, Alvaro Ferrando, Ronaldo Hirata
{"title":"Influence of Opacifiers and Different Dentin Thicknesses on the Optical Properties of a Darkened Teeth with Limited Sound Tissue Reduction.","authors":"Camila Sobral Sampaio, Pablo J Atria, Lisette Aguilera, Hugo Bravo Darrouy, João L B Abreu, Alvaro Ferrando, Ronaldo Hirata","doi":"10.11607/prd.7348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate color masking and relative translucency parameter (RTP) of increasing dentin thicknesses from different resin composites, with or without opacifiers, on a veneer dental preparation and resin disks.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Artificial darkened lateral incisors with 1mm-thick veneers preparations were used to evaluate color masking of different resinous materials, with or without opacifiers: IPS Empress Direct (ED) with or without ED Opaque; and Essentia (ES) with or without ES Masking Liner. For the RTP test; disc-shaped specimens were performed and evaluated with a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade) against black and C4 backgrounds. Color differences were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula (ΔE00).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dentin layer thickness presented no influence on the ΔE00 (P>.05) of the ED group with opacifier; without opacifier, 0.3mm dentin thickness presented higher ΔE00 than 0.8mm layer (P=0.000). For ES group, with and without opacifier, there was a significant decrease in ΔE00 with the increase of dentin thickness (P<.05). All ED groups presented lower ΔE00 than the ES groups (P<.05). All groups showed perceptible color differences, but some ED groups showed acceptable values. For RTP comparisons, a decrease in the ΔE00 was observed with the increase of dentin thickness (P<.05). ED groups with opacifier presented significant lower ΔE00 than ES groups (P<.05). It was observed a significant decrease in ΔE00 for all groups with an opacifier (P<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED combinations with 0.3mm with opacifier and 0.6mm or higher without opacifier were sufficient to mask a C4 background, while ES combinations could not acceptably mask the substrate, according to the acceptability threshold determined. Dentin thicknesses significantly increase at the same pattern as ΔE00 decreases. A black background promoted increased ΔE00 values than a C4 background.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate color masking and relative translucency parameter (RTP) of increasing dentin thicknesses from different resin composites, with or without opacifiers, on a veneer dental preparation and resin disks.

Material and methods: Artificial darkened lateral incisors with 1mm-thick veneers preparations were used to evaluate color masking of different resinous materials, with or without opacifiers: IPS Empress Direct (ED) with or without ED Opaque; and Essentia (ES) with or without ES Masking Liner. For the RTP test; disc-shaped specimens were performed and evaluated with a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade) against black and C4 backgrounds. Color differences were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula (ΔE00).

Results: The dentin layer thickness presented no influence on the ΔE00 (P>.05) of the ED group with opacifier; without opacifier, 0.3mm dentin thickness presented higher ΔE00 than 0.8mm layer (P=0.000). For ES group, with and without opacifier, there was a significant decrease in ΔE00 with the increase of dentin thickness (P<.05). All ED groups presented lower ΔE00 than the ES groups (P<.05). All groups showed perceptible color differences, but some ED groups showed acceptable values. For RTP comparisons, a decrease in the ΔE00 was observed with the increase of dentin thickness (P<.05). ED groups with opacifier presented significant lower ΔE00 than ES groups (P<.05). It was observed a significant decrease in ΔE00 for all groups with an opacifier (P<.05).

Conclusions: ED combinations with 0.3mm with opacifier and 0.6mm or higher without opacifier were sufficient to mask a C4 background, while ES combinations could not acceptably mask the substrate, according to the acceptability threshold determined. Dentin thicknesses significantly increase at the same pattern as ΔE00 decreases. A black background promoted increased ΔE00 values than a C4 background.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信