Evaluation of four common electronic mosquito repellers on Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens.

Luciano Toma, Fabio Lo Castro, Francesco Severini, Roberta Pozzi, Francesca Casale, Michela Menegon, Marco Di Luca, Massimiliano De Luca, Paolo Sperandio, Sergio Iarossi
{"title":"Evaluation of four common electronic mosquito repellers on Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens.","authors":"Luciano Toma, Fabio Lo Castro, Francesco Severini, Roberta Pozzi, Francesca Casale, Michela Menegon, Marco Di Luca, Massimiliano De Luca, Paolo Sperandio, Sergio Iarossi","doi":"10.4415/ANN_24_04_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mosquitoes represent a way of spreading infectious diseases, as vectors of pathogens. Many types of ultrasonic devices have recently been promoted as effective and suitable alternatives to the use of biocides known as toxic to humans and environment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four ultrasonic mosquito repellers have been analysed and tested on females of two species, Culex pipiens and Aedes albopictus, in laboratory conditions. The behavior of the mosquitoes of reaching the attractant, with the repellers both at ON and OFF, was observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total mean number of Cx. pipiens interested to attractant when the repellers were ON was 2.8 versus 2.9 at OFF. The total mean number of Ae. albopictus interested to attractant when the repellers were ON was 5.5 versus 6.1 at OFF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The repellence efficacy resulted not significant (P>0.05) in all the electronic ultrasound repellers tested. The number of mosquitoes of both species, displaying the attractant's search behavior appeared independent from the switch ON/OFF mode. Open questions remain: the need of conducting further research to establish a relationship between ultrasonic emission and mosquito effective disturbance.</p>","PeriodicalId":502090,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"60 4","pages":"258-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_24_04_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mosquitoes represent a way of spreading infectious diseases, as vectors of pathogens. Many types of ultrasonic devices have recently been promoted as effective and suitable alternatives to the use of biocides known as toxic to humans and environment.

Materials and methods: Four ultrasonic mosquito repellers have been analysed and tested on females of two species, Culex pipiens and Aedes albopictus, in laboratory conditions. The behavior of the mosquitoes of reaching the attractant, with the repellers both at ON and OFF, was observed.

Results: The total mean number of Cx. pipiens interested to attractant when the repellers were ON was 2.8 versus 2.9 at OFF. The total mean number of Ae. albopictus interested to attractant when the repellers were ON was 5.5 versus 6.1 at OFF.

Conclusions: The repellence efficacy resulted not significant (P>0.05) in all the electronic ultrasound repellers tested. The number of mosquitoes of both species, displaying the attractant's search behavior appeared independent from the switch ON/OFF mode. Open questions remain: the need of conducting further research to establish a relationship between ultrasonic emission and mosquito effective disturbance.

四种常用电子驱蚊剂对白纹伊蚊和淡库蚊的驱蚊效果评价。
蚊子作为病原体的载体,是传染病传播的一种方式。最近,许多类型的超声波装置被推广为对人类和环境有毒的杀菌剂的有效和合适的替代品。材料与方法:在实验室条件下,对四种超声波驱蚊剂对淡库蚊和白纹伊蚊两种雌蚊进行了分析和试验。观察了驱蚊剂开、关两种状态下,蚊虫到达引诱剂的行为。结果:Cx细胞总平均数目;驱蚊剂开启时,对引诱剂的兴趣为2.8,关闭时为2.9。Ae的总平均数量。当驱蚊剂打开时,白纹伊蚊对引诱剂的兴趣为5.5,而在关闭时为6.1。结论:所有电子超声驱避剂的驱避效果均无显著性差异(P < 0.05)。显示引诱剂搜索行为的两种蚊子数量与打开/关闭模式无关。超声发射与蚊虫有效干扰之间的关系有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信