Participatory risk diagnosis: A preliminary approach to confined space work in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carlos Miguel Iegli da Silva, Fernando Gonçalves Amaral
{"title":"Participatory risk diagnosis: A preliminary approach to confined space work in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries.","authors":"Carlos Miguel Iegli da Silva, Fernando Gonçalves Amaral","doi":"10.3233/WOR-230703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Confined space work poses a significant threat to worker safety and health, especially in industrial environments like petrochemical plants and refineries. These environments present additional hazards beyond those inherent to confined spaces, such as high pressures, temperatures, and exposure to toxic, flammable, and combustible substances.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to apply the Deparis method (Participatory Risk Diagnosis) to confined space work in the oil and gas industry. The goal was to identify the key risk factors involved from the perspective of the workers themselves, propose risk reduction measures where feasible within the Deparis framework, and highlight factors that require more sophisticated methodologies for risk mitigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed the Deparis method to assess 20 different working conditions. The survey yielded a range of results, encompassing issues with readily achievable on-site solutions to more intricate challenges requiring specialized expertise and resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Deparis method successfully identified risk factors present in the tasks from the workers' perspective. The application of risk reduction measures proposed by the method allowed for the criticality of most factors to be reduced to acceptable levels. However, certain critical areas, such as physical space constraints, task organization, communication with confined space workers, and exposure to chemical and biological hazards, were found to require alternative approaches to achieve the desired safety levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the effectiveness of the Deparis method as a valuable tool for evaluating risks in confined space operations and advocates for its broader adoption due to its demonstrated efficacy. Additionally, the study highlights the need for further research and development of more sophisticated risk mitigation strategies for specific critical areas in confined space work within the oil and gas industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Confined space work poses a significant threat to worker safety and health, especially in industrial environments like petrochemical plants and refineries. These environments present additional hazards beyond those inherent to confined spaces, such as high pressures, temperatures, and exposure to toxic, flammable, and combustible substances.

Objective: This study aimed to apply the Deparis method (Participatory Risk Diagnosis) to confined space work in the oil and gas industry. The goal was to identify the key risk factors involved from the perspective of the workers themselves, propose risk reduction measures where feasible within the Deparis framework, and highlight factors that require more sophisticated methodologies for risk mitigation.

Methods: The study employed the Deparis method to assess 20 different working conditions. The survey yielded a range of results, encompassing issues with readily achievable on-site solutions to more intricate challenges requiring specialized expertise and resources.

Results: The Deparis method successfully identified risk factors present in the tasks from the workers' perspective. The application of risk reduction measures proposed by the method allowed for the criticality of most factors to be reduced to acceptable levels. However, certain critical areas, such as physical space constraints, task organization, communication with confined space workers, and exposure to chemical and biological hazards, were found to require alternative approaches to achieve the desired safety levels.

Conclusions: The study underscores the effectiveness of the Deparis method as a valuable tool for evaluating risks in confined space operations and advocates for its broader adoption due to its demonstrated efficacy. Additionally, the study highlights the need for further research and development of more sophisticated risk mitigation strategies for specific critical areas in confined space work within the oil and gas industry.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信