{"title":"The effect of the position of the femoral endobutton on knee function in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective study.","authors":"Libin Xu, Fangyong Lou, Haitao Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05347-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the effect of the position of the femoral endobutton on knee function in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted to analyze 96 patients who underwent single-bundle reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2023. The patients were divided into three groups according to the position of the endobutton on the lateral knee radiography. The first group is the position of endobutton in front of the lateral cortex of the femur, the second group is the position of endobutton in back of the lateral cortex of the femur, and the third group is the position of endobutton behind the femur. Knee Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Evaluation, Tegner Activity Scale, knee flexion angle and postoperative complication rate of the three groups were compared to evaluate whether there were statistical differences among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 39 patients in group 1, 46 patients in group 2, and 11 patients in group 3. The mean Lysholm Knee Scores of the group 1 was 91.77, 92.17 in group 2, and 90.36 in group 3. The mean IKDC Evaluation of group 1 was 90.48, 92.41 in group 2, and 93.00 in group 3. Tegner Activity Level was 5.69 in group 1, 5.72 in group 2, and 5.45 in group 3. The mean flexion degree was found as 125° in patients in group1, 127° in group 2, and 122° in group 3. There was no statistically significant difference between Lysholm Knee Scores (p = 0.434), IKDC (p = 0.068), Tegner Activity Level (p = 0.797), and knee flexion angle (p = 0.135). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of complications among the three groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were not statistically differences in clinical functional results when comparing patients' endobutton location on femur. This indicates that it does not need to adjust the orientation of the exit hole of the femur whether it is forward or backward during the PCLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05347-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To investigate the effect of the position of the femoral endobutton on knee function in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR).
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze 96 patients who underwent single-bundle reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2023. The patients were divided into three groups according to the position of the endobutton on the lateral knee radiography. The first group is the position of endobutton in front of the lateral cortex of the femur, the second group is the position of endobutton in back of the lateral cortex of the femur, and the third group is the position of endobutton behind the femur. Knee Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Evaluation, Tegner Activity Scale, knee flexion angle and postoperative complication rate of the three groups were compared to evaluate whether there were statistical differences among the three groups.
Results: There were 39 patients in group 1, 46 patients in group 2, and 11 patients in group 3. The mean Lysholm Knee Scores of the group 1 was 91.77, 92.17 in group 2, and 90.36 in group 3. The mean IKDC Evaluation of group 1 was 90.48, 92.41 in group 2, and 93.00 in group 3. Tegner Activity Level was 5.69 in group 1, 5.72 in group 2, and 5.45 in group 3. The mean flexion degree was found as 125° in patients in group1, 127° in group 2, and 122° in group 3. There was no statistically significant difference between Lysholm Knee Scores (p = 0.434), IKDC (p = 0.068), Tegner Activity Level (p = 0.797), and knee flexion angle (p = 0.135). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of complications among the three groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: There were not statistically differences in clinical functional results when comparing patients' endobutton location on femur. This indicates that it does not need to adjust the orientation of the exit hole of the femur whether it is forward or backward during the PCLR.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.