Sense and Action: Organizational Reactions in Extreme Crisis: A Survey With Brazilian Executives

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Rosileia Milagres, Maria Elisa Brandão Bernardes, Rodrigo Baroni de Carvalho
{"title":"Sense and Action: Organizational Reactions in Extreme Crisis: A Survey With Brazilian Executives","authors":"Rosileia Milagres,&nbsp;Maria Elisa Brandão Bernardes,&nbsp;Rodrigo Baroni de Carvalho","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The objective of the paper is to analyse the actors' perception regarding how organizational actors lead the reaction of their companies to crises, changing or not their routines accordingly. The paper contributes to enlarging the understanding of crisis management by an original perspective of phenomenon evaluation based on the junction of two literature fields: sensemaking and routines, considering the organizational context that impacts crisis management. A survey of 128 company executives from different industries in Brazil was developed to identify how their companies dealt with the COVID-19 crisis, considering sensemaking, routines and the organizational context. The results unveiled a significant and positive influence of sensemaking and organizational context on the crisis reaction, but not on the deliberated mobilization of the routines, emphasizing improvisation and trial-and-error. The results reinforce fast sensemaking attitudes yielding direct implementation to test the new routines, correcting course of action promptly.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to analyse the actors' perception regarding how organizational actors lead the reaction of their companies to crises, changing or not their routines accordingly. The paper contributes to enlarging the understanding of crisis management by an original perspective of phenomenon evaluation based on the junction of two literature fields: sensemaking and routines, considering the organizational context that impacts crisis management. A survey of 128 company executives from different industries in Brazil was developed to identify how their companies dealt with the COVID-19 crisis, considering sensemaking, routines and the organizational context. The results unveiled a significant and positive influence of sensemaking and organizational context on the crisis reaction, but not on the deliberated mobilization of the routines, emphasizing improvisation and trial-and-error. The results reinforce fast sensemaking attitudes yielding direct implementation to test the new routines, correcting course of action promptly.

理智与行动:极端危机中的组织反应:巴西高管调查
本文的目的是分析参与者对组织参与者如何导致公司对危机的反应的看法,相应地改变或不改变他们的惯例。本文基于语义和惯例两个文献领域的结合,从现象评价的角度出发,考虑影响危机管理的组织情境,有助于扩大对危机管理的理解。对来自巴西不同行业的128名公司高管进行了调查,以确定他们的公司如何应对COVID-19危机,考虑到意义、惯例和组织背景。结果显示,意义建构和组织情境对危机反应有显著的积极影响,但对例行程序的刻意动员没有影响,强调即兴和试错。结果加强了快速意义的态度,产生了直接实施测试新例程,及时纠正行动过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信