Accuracy of Ultrasound Measurements of Muscle Thickness in Identifying Older Patients With Sarcopenia and Its Impact on Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Fengxue Yang, Linfang Zhu, Bing Cao, Li Zeng, Zhongqing Yuan, Yi Tian, Yuanting Li, Xiaoshan Chen
{"title":"Accuracy of Ultrasound Measurements of Muscle Thickness in Identifying Older Patients With Sarcopenia and Its Impact on Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Fengxue Yang, Linfang Zhu, Bing Cao, Li Zeng, Zhongqing Yuan, Yi Tian, Yuanting Li, Xiaoshan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of muscle ultrasound for identifying older patients with sarcopenia and to investigate its association with frailty.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase through October 2024.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Clinical and community settings across 7 countries, with 2537 adults aged ≥65 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers assessed study quality using QUADAS-2. Data on participant characteristics, ultrasound methods, and diagnostic outcomes were extracted. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated with a random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses ensured robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93), specificity was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.65-0.81), DOR was 16.65 (95% CI, 4.90-96.67), and SROC-area under the curve was 0.87, indicating moderate to high diagnostic accuracy. Association with frailty yielded an odds ratio of 7.91 (95% CI, 6.15-10.17). Most studies received an \"unclear\" rating in several QUADAS-2 domains, especially in patient selection and reference standards, indicating limitations in study design that may impact the generalizability of results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Ultrasound is a reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective tool for diagnosing sarcopenia in older patients. Further research should standardize cutoffs and explore integration with other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105419"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of muscle ultrasound for identifying older patients with sarcopenia and to investigate its association with frailty.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase through October 2024.

Setting and participants: Clinical and community settings across 7 countries, with 2537 adults aged ≥65 years.

Methods: Two reviewers assessed study quality using QUADAS-2. Data on participant characteristics, ultrasound methods, and diagnostic outcomes were extracted. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated with a random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses ensured robustness.

Results: Pooled sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93), specificity was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.65-0.81), DOR was 16.65 (95% CI, 4.90-96.67), and SROC-area under the curve was 0.87, indicating moderate to high diagnostic accuracy. Association with frailty yielded an odds ratio of 7.91 (95% CI, 6.15-10.17). Most studies received an "unclear" rating in several QUADAS-2 domains, especially in patient selection and reference standards, indicating limitations in study design that may impact the generalizability of results.

Conclusions and implications: Ultrasound is a reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective tool for diagnosing sarcopenia in older patients. Further research should standardize cutoffs and explore integration with other methods.

超声测量肌肉厚度在识别老年肌肉减少症患者中的准确性及其对虚弱的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述的目的是评估肌肉超声诊断检测的准确性,以识别老年肌肉减少症患者,并探讨其与虚弱的关系。设计:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。在PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus和Embase中进行了全面的搜索,直到2024年10月。环境:7个国家的临床和社区环境,2537名年龄≥65岁的成年人。方法:两位评论者使用QUADAS-2评估研究质量。提取有关参与者特征、超声方法和诊断结果的数据。采用随机效应模型计算合并敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比(DOR)和总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。敏感性分析确保了稳健性。结果:合并敏感性为0.85 (95% CI, 0.78 ~ 0.93),特异性为0.74 (95% CI, 0.65 ~ 0.81), DOR为16.65 (95% CI, 4.90 ~ 96.67), sroc曲线下面积为0.87,诊断准确率中高。与虚弱相关的比值比为7.91 (95% CI, 6.15-10.17)。大多数研究在几个QUADAS-2领域被评为“不清楚”,特别是在患者选择和参考标准方面,这表明研究设计的局限性可能会影响结果的普遍性。结论和意义:超声是诊断老年患者肌肉减少症的一种可靠、无创、经济的工具。进一步的研究应该规范截止点并探索与其他方法的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信