Corrigendum to “An experimentally validated numerical model of pH changes in surrogate tissue induced by electroporation pulses” [Electrochimica Acta, Volume 511, 2025, 145363]

Abstract

It has come to our attention that one of the curves was missing in Fig. 7d in the final published version of our paper. The correct Figure is below.

1. Download: Download high-res image (726KB)
2. Download: Download full-size image

Figure 7. Comparison of the calculated and experimentally determined pH distributions for 8 rectangular pulses with a duration of 10 ms and a pulse repetition rate of 1 s^-1. The amplitude of the pulses was 200 V in (a) and (b), and 400 V in (c) and (d). The results for the unbuffered medium are shown in (a) and (c), while the results for the buffered medium are shown in (b) and (d). The results are shown for a time of 60 seconds to also include the effect of diffusion in the analysis. The dashed lines represent the results of the models where the diffusion coefficients were reduced to 50% of the values given in Table 1. The anode is located on the left (at 0 mm), and the cathode on the right (at 14.3 mm).