Comparative Analysis of Vestibular Dysfunction and Compensation in Ramsay-Hunt Syndrome and Vestibular Neuritis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Benjamin D Lovin, Jeffrey T Vrabec
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Vestibular Dysfunction and Compensation in Ramsay-Hunt Syndrome and Vestibular Neuritis.","authors":"Benjamin D Lovin, Jeffrey T Vrabec","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate vestibular loss and compensation in Ramsay-Hunt syndrome with dizziness (RHS-D) and vestibular neuritis (VN).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study from 2019 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care neurotology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with RHS-D or VN who underwent videonystagmography, including cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), caloric stimulation, rotary chair, and oculomotor testing, were reviewed and stratified by vertigo etiology. The main outcome measures were rates and severity of vestibular loss, as measured by cVEMP and caloric stimulation, and of vestibular compensation, as measured by rotary chair and oculomotor testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients were found to have RHS-D and 22 with VN. Caloric and cVEMP abnormalities were noted in 100 and 70% of RHS-D patients compared to 60 and 20% with VN (P = .029 and P = .034, respectively). RHS-D patients were significantly more likely to present with concurrent caloric and cVEMP abnormalities compared to VN (70 and 13%, respectively; P = .009). Vestibular loss appeared more severe in RHS-D compared to VN suggested by significantly lower mean bithermal slow phase velocity sum (3.8 and 21 degrees per second, respectively), greater canal paresis (78.7 and 40.2%, respectively), and greater cVEMP amplitude asymmetry (64 and 31%, respectively) (P = .014, P < .001, and P = .053, respectively). Regarding vestibular compensation, abnormal gain asymmetry was present in 88% of RHS-D patients with a mean asymmetry of 31.2 compared to 11% in VN with a mean of 14.0 (P = .019 and P = .003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to VN, RHS-D patients appear to suffer from a more profound vestibular loss and a worsened ability to compensate for such deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate vestibular loss and compensation in Ramsay-Hunt syndrome with dizziness (RHS-D) and vestibular neuritis (VN).

Study design: Retrospective cohort study from 2019 to 2023.

Setting: Tertiary care neurotology practice.

Methods: Patients with RHS-D or VN who underwent videonystagmography, including cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), caloric stimulation, rotary chair, and oculomotor testing, were reviewed and stratified by vertigo etiology. The main outcome measures were rates and severity of vestibular loss, as measured by cVEMP and caloric stimulation, and of vestibular compensation, as measured by rotary chair and oculomotor testing.

Results: Ten patients were found to have RHS-D and 22 with VN. Caloric and cVEMP abnormalities were noted in 100 and 70% of RHS-D patients compared to 60 and 20% with VN (P = .029 and P = .034, respectively). RHS-D patients were significantly more likely to present with concurrent caloric and cVEMP abnormalities compared to VN (70 and 13%, respectively; P = .009). Vestibular loss appeared more severe in RHS-D compared to VN suggested by significantly lower mean bithermal slow phase velocity sum (3.8 and 21 degrees per second, respectively), greater canal paresis (78.7 and 40.2%, respectively), and greater cVEMP amplitude asymmetry (64 and 31%, respectively) (P = .014, P < .001, and P = .053, respectively). Regarding vestibular compensation, abnormal gain asymmetry was present in 88% of RHS-D patients with a mean asymmetry of 31.2 compared to 11% in VN with a mean of 14.0 (P = .019 and P = .003, respectively).

Conclusion: Compared to VN, RHS-D patients appear to suffer from a more profound vestibular loss and a worsened ability to compensate for such deficits.

研究目的研究设计:2019-2023年回顾性队列研究:2019年至2023年的回顾性队列研究:三级医院神经耳科:对接受视震造影(包括颈前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)、热量刺激、旋转椅和眼球运动测试)的RHS-D或VN患者进行回顾性研究,并根据眩晕病因进行分层。主要结果指标是通过 cVEMP 和热量刺激测量的前庭损失率和严重程度,以及通过旋转椅和眼球运动测试测量的前庭代偿率和严重程度:结果:10 名患者患有 RHS-D,22 名患者患有 VN。分别有 100 和 70% 的 RHS-D 患者和 60 和 20% 的 VN 患者出现热量和 cVEMP 异常(P = .029 和 P = .034)。与 VN 相比,RHS-D 患者同时出现热量和 cVEMP 异常的几率明显更高(分别为 70% 和 13%;P = .009)。与 VN 相比,RHS-D 患者的前庭功能丧失似乎更严重,这表现在平均双耳慢速相位速度总和明显更低(分别为每秒 3.8 度和 21 度),耳道麻痹程度更高(分别为 78.7% 和 40.2%),cVEMP 振幅不对称程度更高(分别为 64% 和 31%)(P = .014,P 结论:与前庭功能障碍患者相比,RHS-D 患者的前庭功能缺损程度似乎更深,对这种缺损的代偿能力也更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信