Lower obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) supply in abortion-ban states, despite minimal state-level changes in the 2 years post-Dobbs.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae162
Julia Strasser, Ellen Schenk, Qian Luo, Candice Chen
{"title":"Lower obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) supply in abortion-ban states, despite minimal state-level changes in the 2 years post-<i>Dobbs</i>.","authors":"Julia Strasser, Ellen Schenk, Qian Luo, Candice Chen","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the <i>Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> Supreme Court decision in June 2022, emerging reports suggest that the obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) workforce is moving into states without abortion bans. Using a large national administrative database, we identified OBGYNs enrolling in new states from July 2017 through June 2024. We used difference-in-differences (DID) analyses to estimate the effect of <i>Dobbs</i> on enrollments by state abortion policy (ban vs no ban). Enrollments in ban states were lower than in no-ban states in most academic years (June-July) throughout the study period. In the 2 years post-<i>Dobbs</i>, DID models found no significant differences in enrollments in ban states relative to no-ban states. These findings indicate minimal state-level shifts in the OBGYN workforce following <i>Dobbs</i>. Past research has found that a complex constellation of factors drives physician movement, including state licensure, job availability, income, spousal job opportunities, and social support. While the effect of the <i>Dobbs</i> decision on the workforce are likely to be significant, the full impacts on the workforce will take years to fully unfold.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 12","pages":"qxae162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision in June 2022, emerging reports suggest that the obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) workforce is moving into states without abortion bans. Using a large national administrative database, we identified OBGYNs enrolling in new states from July 2017 through June 2024. We used difference-in-differences (DID) analyses to estimate the effect of Dobbs on enrollments by state abortion policy (ban vs no ban). Enrollments in ban states were lower than in no-ban states in most academic years (June-July) throughout the study period. In the 2 years post-Dobbs, DID models found no significant differences in enrollments in ban states relative to no-ban states. These findings indicate minimal state-level shifts in the OBGYN workforce following Dobbs. Past research has found that a complex constellation of factors drives physician movement, including state licensure, job availability, income, spousal job opportunities, and social support. While the effect of the Dobbs decision on the workforce are likely to be significant, the full impacts on the workforce will take years to fully unfold.

禁止堕胎州的妇产科医生(OBGYN)供应量较低,尽管多布斯案后两年内州一级的变化很小。
自 2022 年 6 月最高法院对 "多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织 "一案做出判决以来,新的报告显示,妇产科医生(OBGYN)队伍正在向未禁止堕胎的州迁移。我们利用一个大型全国行政数据库,确定了从 2017 年 7 月到 2024 年 6 月在新州注册的妇产科医生。我们使用差异分析(DID)估计了多布斯对各州堕胎政策(禁止与不禁止)注册人数的影响。在整个研究期间的大多数学年(6 月至 7 月),禁止堕胎州的入学率低于未禁止堕胎州。在多布斯事件后的两年中,DID 模型发现禁止堕胎州的入学人数与禁止堕胎州相比没有显著差异。这些研究结果表明,多布斯事件后各州妇产科医生队伍的变化微乎其微。过去的研究发现,推动医生流动的因素错综复杂,包括州执照、工作机会、收入、配偶工作机会和社会支持。虽然多布斯案的判决可能会对医生队伍产生重大影响,但对医生队伍的全面影响还需要数年时间才能完全显现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信