Effects of intra-articular versus peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy in knee osteoarthritis: A clinical trial study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Leila Sadat Mohamadi Jahromi, Hadi Dashtimakan, Sharareh Roshanzamir, Alireza Dabbaghmanesh, Reyhaneh Parvin
{"title":"Effects of intra-articular versus peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy in knee osteoarthritis: A clinical trial study.","authors":"Leila Sadat Mohamadi Jahromi, Hadi Dashtimakan, Sharareh Roshanzamir, Alireza Dabbaghmanesh, Reyhaneh Parvin","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular and peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) without effusion.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between August 2018 and November 2018, a total of 51 participants including 27 cases (12 males, 15 females; mean age: 55.7±5.2 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group A and 24 cases (9 males, 15 females; mean age: 54.7±4.6 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group B were recruited. Group A received intra-articular DPT, while Group B received peri-articular DPT. Treatment was administered two times with two-week intervals. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Scale (OKS) questionnaires were filled at baseline, and four and eight weeks after first injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At four and eight weeks, the VAS, OKS, and WOMAC scores improved from baseline in both groups. There was no significant difference in the WOMAC and OKS scores between two methods. The VAS scores showed superiority of intra-articular method (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both peri-articular and intra-articular DPT were effective in patients with KOA. There was no superiority in terms of functional improvement between two groups. However, intra-articular prolotherapy was more effective in decreasing pain in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 3","pages":"327-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular and peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) without effusion.

Patients and methods: Between August 2018 and November 2018, a total of 51 participants including 27 cases (12 males, 15 females; mean age: 55.7±5.2 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group A and 24 cases (9 males, 15 females; mean age: 54.7±4.6 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group B were recruited. Group A received intra-articular DPT, while Group B received peri-articular DPT. Treatment was administered two times with two-week intervals. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Scale (OKS) questionnaires were filled at baseline, and four and eight weeks after first injection.

Results: At four and eight weeks, the VAS, OKS, and WOMAC scores improved from baseline in both groups. There was no significant difference in the WOMAC and OKS scores between two methods. The VAS scores showed superiority of intra-articular method (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Both peri-articular and intra-articular DPT were effective in patients with KOA. There was no superiority in terms of functional improvement between two groups. However, intra-articular prolotherapy was more effective in decreasing pain in these patients.

膝关节骨性关节炎关节内与关节周围葡萄糖增生疗法的效果:临床试验研究。
研究目的本研究旨在比较膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)患者关节内和关节周围葡萄糖增生疗法(DPT)对无积液患者的疗效:2018年8月至2018年11月期间,共招募51名参与者,包括A组27例(男12例,女15例;平均年龄:(55.7±5.2)岁;范围:38至70岁)和B组24例(男9例,女15例;平均年龄:(54.7±4.6)岁;范围:38至70岁)。A 组接受关节内 DPT 治疗,B 组接受关节周围 DPT 治疗。治疗共进行两次,每次间隔两周。在基线、首次注射后的四周和八周填写视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)和牛津膝关节量表(OKS)问卷:结果:在四周和八周时,两组的 VAS、OKS 和 WOMAC 评分均比基线有所提高。两种方法的 WOMAC 和 OKS 评分无明显差异。VAS 评分显示关节内方法更优(p 结论:关节周围和关节内 DPT 对 KOA 患者均有效。两组患者在功能改善方面没有优劣之分。不过,关节内注射疗法在减轻这些患者的疼痛方面更为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信