Exploring safety effects on urban expressway diverging areas: crash risk estimation considering extreme conflict types.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jiaqiang Wen, Nengchao Lyu, Lai Zheng
{"title":"Exploring safety effects on urban expressway diverging areas: crash risk estimation considering extreme conflict types.","authors":"Jiaqiang Wen, Nengchao Lyu, Lai Zheng","doi":"10.1080/17457300.2024.2440940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research solely employed a single type of conflict extremes for crash estimation, without considering the joint impact of multiple types of conflict extremes on crash risk. Therefore, two analysis frameworks based on conflict extremes were proposed: separate modeling and cooperative modeling. Based on the trajectories from five diverging areas, longitudinal and lateral conflicts were extracted. Then, a Bayesian hierarchical model for joint multi-location conflict extremes was constructed. Next, the threshold for conflict extremes was determined using automatic mean residual life plots, and a link function was established between the logarithmic scale parameter and dynamic and static variables. Finally, model parameters were estimated using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation method, and a comparative analysis of crash probabilities and overall risks for diverging areas in the two frameworks was conducted by the fitted distributions. The results show that density differences, speed differences, and the ratio of large vehicles are important covariates explaining the non-stationarity of conflict extremes. In terms of crash probability, significant covariates exhibit stronger explanatory power for longitudinal conflicts compared to lateral conflicts. At the overall risk level, the accuracy of the separate modeling is higher compared to the cooperative modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":47014,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2024.2440940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research solely employed a single type of conflict extremes for crash estimation, without considering the joint impact of multiple types of conflict extremes on crash risk. Therefore, two analysis frameworks based on conflict extremes were proposed: separate modeling and cooperative modeling. Based on the trajectories from five diverging areas, longitudinal and lateral conflicts were extracted. Then, a Bayesian hierarchical model for joint multi-location conflict extremes was constructed. Next, the threshold for conflict extremes was determined using automatic mean residual life plots, and a link function was established between the logarithmic scale parameter and dynamic and static variables. Finally, model parameters were estimated using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation method, and a comparative analysis of crash probabilities and overall risks for diverging areas in the two frameworks was conducted by the fitted distributions. The results show that density differences, speed differences, and the ratio of large vehicles are important covariates explaining the non-stationarity of conflict extremes. In terms of crash probability, significant covariates exhibit stronger explanatory power for longitudinal conflicts compared to lateral conflicts. At the overall risk level, the accuracy of the separate modeling is higher compared to the cooperative modeling.

探索城市快速路分岔区域的安全效应:考虑极端冲突类型的碰撞风险估计。
以往的研究仅采用单一类型的冲突极值进行碰撞估计,没有考虑多种类型冲突极值对碰撞风险的共同影响。为此,提出了两种基于冲突极值的分析框架:独立建模和协作建模。基于五个发散区域的轨迹,提取纵向和横向冲突。然后,构建了联合多位置冲突极值的贝叶斯层次模型。其次,利用自动平均残差寿命图确定冲突极值阈值,并建立对数尺度参数与动态、静态变量之间的联系函数;最后,采用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗模拟方法估计模型参数,并通过拟合分布对比分析两种框架中发散区域的碰撞概率和总体风险。结果表明,密度差、速度差和大型车辆比例是解释冲突极值非平稳性的重要协变量。在碰撞概率方面,显著协变量对纵向冲突的解释能力强于横向冲突。在整体风险水平上,独立建模的准确率高于协同建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion (formerly Injury Control and Safety Promotion) publishes articles concerning all phases of injury control, including prevention, acute care and rehabilitation. Specifically, this journal will publish articles that for each type of injury: •describe the problem •analyse the causes and risk factors •discuss the design and evaluation of solutions •describe the implementation of effective programs and policies The journal encompasses all causes of fatal and non-fatal injury, including injuries related to: •transport •school and work •home and leisure activities •sport •violence and assault
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信