Policy Options for Reducing Defensive Medicine Behaviors: A Multi-Method Study.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.86
Ehsan Zarei, Iman Yousefi, Saba Shiranirad, Tahmineh Poursaki, Mohamad Mehdi Zahmatkesh, Pouria Farrokhi
{"title":"Policy Options for Reducing Defensive Medicine Behaviors: A Multi-Method Study.","authors":"Ehsan Zarei, Iman Yousefi, Saba Shiranirad, Tahmineh Poursaki, Mohamad Mehdi Zahmatkesh, Pouria Farrokhi","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Defensive medicine (DM) refers to taking or not taking clinical actions, mainly to prevent legal or reputational consequences. It increases patient and health system costs and threatens patient safety. This study aimed to provide policy options to reduce DM behaviors and was conducted in two phases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, a scoping review was conducted by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus databases in 2000-2023, and interventions and strategies to control DM behaviors were identified. To recognize the advantages, disadvantages, and implementation considerations, one session of focus group discussion (FGD) with experts was designed. Finally, the policies, strategies, advantages, disadvantages, and implementation considerations were refined and categorized during two expert panel sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the search, 1774 articles were retrieved. Finally, after the screening process, 58 articles were included in the study. Four main policy options were formulated: \"evidence-based medicine,\" \"legal reforms,\" \"promotion of professional ethics and a supportive environment,\" and \"improving the doctor-patient relationship.\" In the following, 13 interventions and strategies, 18 advantages, 18 disadvantages, and 21 implementation considerations were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To manage and reduce the effects of DM behaviors, different interventions at macro, organizational, and individual levels are needed. At the micro and individual levels, the enhancement of knowledge and skills is valuable. Organizational interventions that create a supportive culture and promote ethical behavior are also important.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"38 ","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11644114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Defensive medicine (DM) refers to taking or not taking clinical actions, mainly to prevent legal or reputational consequences. It increases patient and health system costs and threatens patient safety. This study aimed to provide policy options to reduce DM behaviors and was conducted in two phases.

Methods: First, a scoping review was conducted by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus databases in 2000-2023, and interventions and strategies to control DM behaviors were identified. To recognize the advantages, disadvantages, and implementation considerations, one session of focus group discussion (FGD) with experts was designed. Finally, the policies, strategies, advantages, disadvantages, and implementation considerations were refined and categorized during two expert panel sessions.

Results: During the search, 1774 articles were retrieved. Finally, after the screening process, 58 articles were included in the study. Four main policy options were formulated: "evidence-based medicine," "legal reforms," "promotion of professional ethics and a supportive environment," and "improving the doctor-patient relationship." In the following, 13 interventions and strategies, 18 advantages, 18 disadvantages, and 21 implementation considerations were identified.

Conclusion: To manage and reduce the effects of DM behaviors, different interventions at macro, organizational, and individual levels are needed. At the micro and individual levels, the enhancement of knowledge and skills is valuable. Organizational interventions that create a supportive culture and promote ethical behavior are also important.

减少防御性医疗行为的政策选择:一项多方法研究
背景:防御性医疗(Defensive Medicine,DM)是指采取或不采取临床行动,主要是为了防止法律或声誉方面的后果。它增加了患者和医疗系统的成本,并威胁到患者的安全。本研究旨在提供减少防御性医疗行为的政策选择,分两个阶段进行:首先,通过检索 Web of Science、PubMed、ProQuest 和 Scopus 数据库(2000-2023 年)进行了范围综述,确定了控制 DM 行为的干预措施和策略。为了解其优缺点和实施注意事项,设计了一次与专家的焦点小组讨论(FGD)。最后,在两次专家小组会议上对政策、策略、优缺点和实施注意事项进行了完善和分类:在检索过程中,共检索到 1774 篇文章。最后,经过筛选,58 篇文章被纳入研究。制定了四种主要政策选择:"循证医学"、"法律改革"、"促进职业道德和支持性环境 "和 "改善医患关系"。随后,确定了 13 项干预措施和策略、18 项优势、18 项劣势和 21 项实施注意事项:为了管理和减少 DM 行为的影响,需要在宏观、组织和个人层面采取不同的干预措施。在微观和个人层面,提高知识和技能是有价值的。创建支持性文化和促进道德行为的组织干预措施也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信