Six-year clinical evaluation of a copper-containing universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: A split-mouth double-blind randomized clinical trial

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Romina Ñaupari-Villasante , Byron Carpio-Salvatierra , Thalita P. Matos , André de Freitas , Romina Aliaga-Galvez , Mario F. Gutiérrez , María Cristina Binz-Ordonez , Alessandra Reis , Alessandro D. Loguercio
{"title":"Six-year clinical evaluation of a copper-containing universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: A split-mouth double-blind randomized clinical trial","authors":"Romina Ñaupari-Villasante ,&nbsp;Byron Carpio-Salvatierra ,&nbsp;Thalita P. Matos ,&nbsp;André de Freitas ,&nbsp;Romina Aliaga-Galvez ,&nbsp;Mario F. Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;María Cristina Binz-Ordonez ,&nbsp;Alessandra Reis ,&nbsp;Alessandro D. Loguercio","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the clinical performance of a universal adhesive system containing 0.1 % copper nanoparticles (CuNp) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 6 years.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Two hundred and sixteen restorations (<em>n</em> = 54) were randomly placed in 36 participants with at least four NCCLs. Groups included: ER-Cu (adhesive in etch-and-rinse strategy with CuNp), ER-Ct (etch-and-rinse without CuNp), SE-Cu (self-etch with CuNp), and SE-Ct (self-etch without CuNp). Restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 1, 3, 4, and 6 years using the FDI and USPHS criteria. Primary outcome: fracture of material and retention. Examiners and patients were blinded to group assignment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After 6 years, 104 restorations were analyzed (ER-Cu 24, ER-Ct 29, SE-Cu 27, SE-Ct 24). Fourteen restorations loss retention (ER-Cu 6, ER-Ct 1, SE-Cu 2, SE-Ct 7). Retention rates (95 % confidence interval) were 79.3 % (61.6 – 90.1) for ER-Cu; 97.0 % (83.3 – 99.4) for ER-Ct; 93.1 % (78.1 – 98.1) for SE-Cu; and 76.7 % (59.1 – 88.2) for SE-Ct, with statistical differences between SE-Cu vs. ER-Ct, and SE-Ct vs. ER-Ct (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Thirty-one restorations (ER-Cu 6, ER-Ct 5, SE-Cu 9, SE-Ct 11) showed minor marginal staining, and forty-one restorations (ER-Cu 8, ER-Ct 10, SE-Cu 11, SE-Ct 12) presented minimal marginal adaptation defects (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). No significant differences were found for other secondary parameters (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first 6-year clinical trial showing the long-term behavior of a universal adhesive system in NCCLs. The addition of CuNp does not affect the clinical performance of the universal adhesive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 105532"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224007012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical performance of a universal adhesive system containing 0.1 % copper nanoparticles (CuNp) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 6 years.

Material and methods

Two hundred and sixteen restorations (n = 54) were randomly placed in 36 participants with at least four NCCLs. Groups included: ER-Cu (adhesive in etch-and-rinse strategy with CuNp), ER-Ct (etch-and-rinse without CuNp), SE-Cu (self-etch with CuNp), and SE-Ct (self-etch without CuNp). Restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 1, 3, 4, and 6 years using the FDI and USPHS criteria. Primary outcome: fracture of material and retention. Examiners and patients were blinded to group assignment.

Results

After 6 years, 104 restorations were analyzed (ER-Cu 24, ER-Ct 29, SE-Cu 27, SE-Ct 24). Fourteen restorations loss retention (ER-Cu 6, ER-Ct 1, SE-Cu 2, SE-Ct 7). Retention rates (95 % confidence interval) were 79.3 % (61.6 – 90.1) for ER-Cu; 97.0 % (83.3 – 99.4) for ER-Ct; 93.1 % (78.1 – 98.1) for SE-Cu; and 76.7 % (59.1 – 88.2) for SE-Ct, with statistical differences between SE-Cu vs. ER-Ct, and SE-Ct vs. ER-Ct (p < 0.05). Thirty-one restorations (ER-Cu 6, ER-Ct 5, SE-Cu 9, SE-Ct 11) showed minor marginal staining, and forty-one restorations (ER-Cu 8, ER-Ct 10, SE-Cu 11, SE-Ct 12) presented minimal marginal adaptation defects (p > 0.05). No significant differences were found for other secondary parameters (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This is the first 6-year clinical trial showing the long-term behavior of a universal adhesive system in NCCLs. The addition of CuNp does not affect the clinical performance of the universal adhesive.
含铜通用粘合剂在非龋齿性宫颈病变中的六年临床评估:分口双盲随机临床试验。
目的:评估含有 0.1%纳米铜粒子(CuNp)的通用粘合剂系统在非龋性宫颈病变(NCCL)6 年后的临床表现:评估含有0.1%纳米铜颗粒(CuNp)的通用粘接系统在非龋性颈椎病变(NCCL)6年后的临床表现:在 36 名至少有四个 NCCL 的参与者中随机放置了 216 个修复体(n = 54)。各组包括ER-Cu组(使用CuNp的蚀刻-冲洗策略粘接)、ER-Ct组(不使用CuNp的蚀刻-冲洗)、SE-Cu组(使用CuNp的自酸蚀)和SE-Ct组(不使用CuNp的自酸蚀)。根据 FDI 和 USPHS 标准,在基线和 1、3、4、6 年后对修复体进行评估。检查人员和患者均为盲人:6年后,共分析了104颗修复体(ER-Cu 24颗、ER-Ct 29颗、SE-Cu 27颗、SE-Ct 24颗)。14颗修复体丧失了固位(ER-Cu 6颗、ER-Ct 1颗、SE-Cu 2颗、SE-Ct 7颗)。ER-Cu的固位率(95%置信区间)为79.3%(61.6 - 90.1);ER-Ct为97.0%(83.3 - 99.4);SE-Cu为93.1%(78.1 - 98.1);SE-Ct为76.7%(59.1 - 88.2),SE-Cu与ER-Ct、SE-Ct与ER-Ct之间存在统计学差异(P < 0.05)。31颗修复体(ER-Cu 6、ER-Ct 5、SE-Cu 9、SE-Ct 11)出现了轻微的边缘染色,41颗修复体(ER-Cu 8、ER-Ct 10、SE-Cu 11、SE-Ct 12)出现了最小的边缘适应缺陷(p > 0.05)。其他次要参数无明显差异(P > 0.05):这是首个为期 6 年的临床试验,显示了通用粘接剂系统在 NCCL 中的长期表现。添加 CuNp 不会影响通用粘合剂的临床表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信