Validity evidence for a French version of the Stigma of Occupational Stress Scale for Doctors (SOSS-D).

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Nadia M Bajwa, Sohie Favre, Thomas Perneger, Melissa Dominicé Dao, Marie-Claude Audetat, Mathieu R Nendaz, Noëlle Junod Perron, Hélène Richard-Lepouriel
{"title":"Validity evidence for a French version of the Stigma of Occupational Stress Scale for Doctors (SOSS-D).","authors":"Nadia M Bajwa, Sohie Favre, Thomas Perneger, Melissa Dominicé Dao, Marie-Claude Audetat, Mathieu R Nendaz, Noëlle Junod Perron, Hélène Richard-Lepouriel","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physicians demonstrate low rates of help seeking for psychiatric disorders, occupational stress, and burnout due to perceived stigma. The Stigma of Occupational Stress Scale for Doctors (SOSS-D) is a brief standardized tool designed to measure stigma (personal, perceived other, and perceived structural) in physicians. The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for a French version of the SOSS-D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SOSS-D was translated into French and piloted with 12 physicians. The scale was administered to physicians at the Geneva University Hospitals. We computed descriptive statistics and internal consistency coefficients. Construct validity was analyzed using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor (CFA) analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 323 physicians participated in the survey. The internal consistency coefficient for the French SOSS-D was 0.72, 0.55 for the personal stigma subscale, 0.66 for the perceived other stigma subscale, and 0.65 for the perceived structural stigma subscale. CFA indicated a marginal fit. EFA revealed three factors: personal, perceived other, and perceived structural stigma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings support the hypothesis that stigma is a multi-dimensional construct. However, the French version of the SOSS-D scale did demonstrate some differences when compared to its English version. Identifying stigmatization beliefs among physicians may allow for increased identification of physicians at risk, and increased communication concerning preventive actions. Moreover, being aware of and fighting stigma can reduce barriers to help seeking and increased access to care resources for burnt-out physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide evidence of the validity and reliability of the French version of the SOSS-D indicating its suitability for use in a French-speaking physician population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2024.10.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Physicians demonstrate low rates of help seeking for psychiatric disorders, occupational stress, and burnout due to perceived stigma. The Stigma of Occupational Stress Scale for Doctors (SOSS-D) is a brief standardized tool designed to measure stigma (personal, perceived other, and perceived structural) in physicians. The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for a French version of the SOSS-D.

Methods: The SOSS-D was translated into French and piloted with 12 physicians. The scale was administered to physicians at the Geneva University Hospitals. We computed descriptive statistics and internal consistency coefficients. Construct validity was analyzed using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor (CFA) analyses.

Results: In total, 323 physicians participated in the survey. The internal consistency coefficient for the French SOSS-D was 0.72, 0.55 for the personal stigma subscale, 0.66 for the perceived other stigma subscale, and 0.65 for the perceived structural stigma subscale. CFA indicated a marginal fit. EFA revealed three factors: personal, perceived other, and perceived structural stigma.

Discussion: Our findings support the hypothesis that stigma is a multi-dimensional construct. However, the French version of the SOSS-D scale did demonstrate some differences when compared to its English version. Identifying stigmatization beliefs among physicians may allow for increased identification of physicians at risk, and increased communication concerning preventive actions. Moreover, being aware of and fighting stigma can reduce barriers to help seeking and increased access to care resources for burnt-out physicians.

Conclusion: The results provide evidence of the validity and reliability of the French version of the SOSS-D indicating its suitability for use in a French-speaking physician population.

法文版医生职业压力耻辱感量表(SOSS-D)的有效性证据。
目的:医生在精神障碍、职业压力和职业倦怠方面的求助率很低,原因是他们认为自己受到了侮辱。医生职业压力耻辱感量表(SOSS-D)是一种简短的标准化工具,旨在测量医生的耻辱感(个人耻辱感、他人耻辱感和结构耻辱感)。本研究旨在收集法文版 SOSS-D 的有效性证据:SOSS-D 被翻译成法文,并在 12 名医生中试用。日内瓦大学医院的医生使用了该量表。我们计算了描述性统计和内部一致性系数。我们使用探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)对结构效度进行了分析:共有 323 名医生参与了调查。法文 SOSS-D 的内部一致性系数为 0.72,个人成见分量表为 0.55,感知到的其他成见分量表为 0.66,感知到的结构性成见分量表为 0.65。CFA 表明拟合度较低。EFA 显示了三个因子:个人成见、感知到的其他成见和感知到的结构性成见:我们的研究结果支持成见是一种多维结构的假设。然而,法文版 SOSS-D 量表与英文版相比确实存在一些差异。识别医生的鄙视信念可以提高对高风险医生的识别能力,并加强有关预防措施的沟通。此外,意识到污名化并与之抗争,可以减少焦虑医生寻求帮助的障碍,增加他们获得护理资源的机会:结果证明了法文版 SOSS-D 的有效性和可靠性,表明它适合在讲法语的医生群体中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Une revue française de renommée internationale. - Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient. - Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises. - Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale. - Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.). - Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue. La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau. - Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques : - des éditoriaux de médecins référents, - une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales, - des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances, - des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique, - des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question. - L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信