Evaluation of plant-based coagulants for turbidity removal and coagulant dosage prediction using machine learning.

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Technology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1080/09593330.2024.2439183
Poloko Ivy Namane, Moatlhodi Wise Letshwenyo, Abid Yahya
{"title":"Evaluation of plant-based coagulants for turbidity removal and coagulant dosage prediction using machine learning.","authors":"Poloko Ivy Namane, Moatlhodi Wise Letshwenyo, Abid Yahya","doi":"10.1080/09593330.2024.2439183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the use of six plant-based coagulants - <i>Acacia erioloba</i>, <i>Ricinodendron rautanenii</i>, <i>Schinziophyton rautanenii</i>, <i>Peltophorum africanum</i>, <i>Delonix regia</i>, and <i>Maerua angolensis</i> for the removal of turbidity from wastewater effluent. The coagulants were characterized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to determine morphological structure, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to assess chemical composition, and X-ray diffraction to analyse the molecular structure. The coagulation process was evaluated using jar tests with varying coagulant dosages and pH levels. SEM images revealed irregular, rough surfaces, with all materials being amorphous and non-crystalline. Significant levels of essential elements, including iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), sulphur (S), and potassium (K) were revealed. Turbidity removal efficiency fluctuated with pH, showing optimal results under alkaline conditions. Notably, strong negative correlations between pH and turbidity were observed for all coagulants except <i>Peltophorum africanum</i> at a dosage of 20 g/L. Doubling the coagulant volume achieved turbidity reductions between 59% and 92.24%, except for <i>Acacia erioloba</i> and <i>Ricinodendron rautanenii</i> at a dosage of 40 g/L, which showed increased turbidity. The study also employed machine learning techniques to analyse the data and predict the most effective coagulant dosage under different pH conditions. These findings suggest that plant-based coagulants could be viable alternatives to chemical coagulants, with machine learning providing accurate predictions of coagulation performance. Further research is recommended to explore the capabilities of these natural coagulants fully.</p>","PeriodicalId":12009,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2570-2585"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2024.2439183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the use of six plant-based coagulants - Acacia erioloba, Ricinodendron rautanenii, Schinziophyton rautanenii, Peltophorum africanum, Delonix regia, and Maerua angolensis for the removal of turbidity from wastewater effluent. The coagulants were characterized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to determine morphological structure, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to assess chemical composition, and X-ray diffraction to analyse the molecular structure. The coagulation process was evaluated using jar tests with varying coagulant dosages and pH levels. SEM images revealed irregular, rough surfaces, with all materials being amorphous and non-crystalline. Significant levels of essential elements, including iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), sulphur (S), and potassium (K) were revealed. Turbidity removal efficiency fluctuated with pH, showing optimal results under alkaline conditions. Notably, strong negative correlations between pH and turbidity were observed for all coagulants except Peltophorum africanum at a dosage of 20 g/L. Doubling the coagulant volume achieved turbidity reductions between 59% and 92.24%, except for Acacia erioloba and Ricinodendron rautanenii at a dosage of 40 g/L, which showed increased turbidity. The study also employed machine learning techniques to analyse the data and predict the most effective coagulant dosage under different pH conditions. These findings suggest that plant-based coagulants could be viable alternatives to chemical coagulants, with machine learning providing accurate predictions of coagulation performance. Further research is recommended to explore the capabilities of these natural coagulants fully.

植物基混凝剂去除浊度的评价和使用机器学习的混凝剂用量预测。
本研究研究了六种植物为基础的混凝剂——金合欢、蓖麻、蓖麻、非洲Peltophorum africanum、Delonix regia和Maerua angolensis对废水出水浊度的去除效果。采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)确定凝聚剂的形态结构,x射线荧光(XRF)评估其化学成分,x射线衍射分析其分子结构。用不同混凝剂剂量和pH值的罐子试验来评价混凝过程。扫描电镜图像显示不规则,粗糙的表面,所有材料都是无定形和非晶的。必需元素的显著水平,包括铁(Fe),钙(Ca),硫(S)和钾(K)。除浊率随pH值波动,在碱性条件下效果最佳。值得注意的是,除20 g/L投加量下的非洲石竹外,所有混凝剂的pH值与浊度均呈显著负相关。混凝剂用量增加一倍,浊度降低59% ~ 92.24%,但金合欢和蓖麻在40 g/L投加量时浊度升高。该研究还采用了机器学习技术来分析数据,并预测不同pH条件下最有效的混凝剂用量。这些发现表明,基于植物的混凝剂可能是化学混凝剂的可行替代品,机器学习可以提供准确的混凝性能预测。建议进一步研究以充分探索这些天然混凝剂的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology
Environmental Technology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology is a leading journal for the rapid publication of science and technology papers on a wide range of topics in applied environmental studies, from environmental engineering to environmental biotechnology, the circular economy, municipal and industrial wastewater management, drinking-water treatment, air- and water-pollution control, solid-waste management, industrial hygiene and associated technologies. Environmental Technology is intended to provide rapid publication of new developments in environmental technology. The journal has an international readership with a broad scientific base. Contributions will be accepted from scientists and engineers in industry, government and universities. Accepted manuscripts are generally published within four months. Please note that Environmental Technology does not publish any review papers unless for a specified special issue which is decided by the Editor. Please do submit your review papers to our sister journal Environmental Technology Reviews at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tetr20/current
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信