Dance with me? Analyzing interpersonal synchrony and quality of interaction during joint dance.

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Noemí Grinspun, Eden Landesman, Yonnhatan García, Tal-Chen Rabinowitch
{"title":"Dance with me? Analyzing interpersonal synchrony and quality of interaction during joint dance.","authors":"Noemí Grinspun, Eden Landesman, Yonnhatan García, Tal-Chen Rabinowitch","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02563-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This methodological paper examines the assessment of interpersonal synchrony during a joint dancing task between mothers and their children (aged 4 to 5 years) using OpenPose. This pose estimation tool captures movement in naturalistic settings. The study analyzes 45 mother-child dyads, comparing two analytical methods for assessing synchrony, and examines their correlation with the Coding Interactive Behavior (CIB) measure of interaction quality. The first method employs cross-wavelet transform (CWT) coherence to assess synchrony based on vertical head movement. This straightforward and computationally efficient approach reveals a significant correlation between interpersonal synchrony and CIB scores, thus implying its potential as a reliable indicator of interaction quality and suggesting its potential as a measure of interaction quality. The second method, the generalized cross-wavelet transform (GCWT), analyzes synchrony across multiple body parts, offering a more complex and detailed analysis of interpersonal dynamics. However, it did not significantly correlate with the CIB scores. Our findings suggest that focusing on head movement using CWT can effectively capture critical elements of interpersonal synchrony linked to interaction quality. In contrast, despite its richness, the more complex GCWT approach may not align as closely with observed interactive behaviors as the CIB scores indicate. This study underscores the need to balance methodological complexity and ecological validity in research, offering insights into selecting analytical techniques based on research objectives and the nuances of interpersonal dynamics. Our results contribute to the field of interpersonal synchrony research, emphasizing the benefits of efficient methods in understanding mother-child interactions and interaction relationships in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02563-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This methodological paper examines the assessment of interpersonal synchrony during a joint dancing task between mothers and their children (aged 4 to 5 years) using OpenPose. This pose estimation tool captures movement in naturalistic settings. The study analyzes 45 mother-child dyads, comparing two analytical methods for assessing synchrony, and examines their correlation with the Coding Interactive Behavior (CIB) measure of interaction quality. The first method employs cross-wavelet transform (CWT) coherence to assess synchrony based on vertical head movement. This straightforward and computationally efficient approach reveals a significant correlation between interpersonal synchrony and CIB scores, thus implying its potential as a reliable indicator of interaction quality and suggesting its potential as a measure of interaction quality. The second method, the generalized cross-wavelet transform (GCWT), analyzes synchrony across multiple body parts, offering a more complex and detailed analysis of interpersonal dynamics. However, it did not significantly correlate with the CIB scores. Our findings suggest that focusing on head movement using CWT can effectively capture critical elements of interpersonal synchrony linked to interaction quality. In contrast, despite its richness, the more complex GCWT approach may not align as closely with observed interactive behaviors as the CIB scores indicate. This study underscores the need to balance methodological complexity and ecological validity in research, offering insights into selecting analytical techniques based on research objectives and the nuances of interpersonal dynamics. Our results contribute to the field of interpersonal synchrony research, emphasizing the benefits of efficient methods in understanding mother-child interactions and interaction relationships in general.

和我跳舞?分析联合舞蹈中人与人之间的同步性和互动质量。
这篇方法学论文检查了使用OpenPose在母亲和他们的孩子(4至5岁)之间的联合舞蹈任务中对人际同步性的评估。这个姿势估计工具在自然环境中捕捉运动。本研究分析了45对母子对,比较了两种评估同步性的分析方法,并检验了它们与交互质量的编码交互行为(CIB)测量的相关性。第一种方法采用交叉小波变换(CWT)相干性来评估基于垂直头部运动的同步性。这种简单且计算效率高的方法揭示了人际同步性和CIB分数之间的显著相关性,从而暗示了其作为交互质量可靠指标的潜力,并暗示了其作为交互质量测量的潜力。第二种方法是广义交叉小波变换(GCWT),它分析多个身体部位之间的同步性,提供更复杂和详细的人际动态分析。然而,它与CIB分数没有显著相关。我们的研究结果表明,使用CWT关注头部运动可以有效地捕获与互动质量相关的人际同步的关键因素。相比之下,尽管它的丰富性,更复杂的GCWT方法可能不像CIB分数所显示的那样与观察到的交互行为紧密一致。这项研究强调了在研究中平衡方法复杂性和生态有效性的必要性,为基于研究目标和人际动力学的细微差别选择分析技术提供了见解。我们的研究结果有助于人际同步研究领域,强调有效方法在理解母子互动和一般互动关系方面的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信