Straight From the Source: Doctor of Physical Therapy Students' Perspectives on the Impacts of Program Policies and Procedures on Sense of Belonging.

Madeline Ratoza, Peyton D Sykes, Sara E North
{"title":"Straight From the Source: Doctor of Physical Therapy Students' Perspectives on the Impacts of Program Policies and Procedures on Sense of Belonging.","authors":"Madeline Ratoza, Peyton D Sykes, Sara E North","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an urgent need to increase access to and inclusion in health professions education programs for individuals with diverse backgrounds and needs. The purpose of this study is to explore student perspectives of the ways in which current Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) program policies, procedures, and practices may facilitate or hinder a culture of belonging and the ability to participate across diverse student identities and needs.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>To date, there are no best practices in promoting and supporting health profession student belonging, and the student voice is absent in the literature. This prompts a need for guidance on where and how academic DPT programs should focus initial efforts as they self-assess their degree of compliance with newly revised accreditation standards.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Sixteen DPT student volunteers from 2 institutions across 4 campuses in 4 states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional qualitative study using thematic analysis with semistructured interviews was used to gather student perspectives regarding factors that positively and negatively affect sense of belonging. Three researchers qualitatively analyzed transcriptions using a combination of open and axial coding to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final consensus coding yielded 179 coded responses across 95 unique codes categorized in 6 themes: faculty and staff relationships, program policies and procedures, cohort and peer relationships, diverse identities, communication, and program resources.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This is the first study known to investigate the use of student voice to better understand, operationalize, and potentially improve belonging within DPT education. Results demonstrate that when given a voice, students are able to articulate both observations of present-state sense of belonging and clear ideas and recommendations for ways in which DPT programs could address sense of belonging. Findings may help frame program policies and procedures from the student lens by offering themes, strategies, and recommendations for promoting a culture of belonging.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is an urgent need to increase access to and inclusion in health professions education programs for individuals with diverse backgrounds and needs. The purpose of this study is to explore student perspectives of the ways in which current Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) program policies, procedures, and practices may facilitate or hinder a culture of belonging and the ability to participate across diverse student identities and needs.

Review of literature: To date, there are no best practices in promoting and supporting health profession student belonging, and the student voice is absent in the literature. This prompts a need for guidance on where and how academic DPT programs should focus initial efforts as they self-assess their degree of compliance with newly revised accreditation standards.

Participants: Sixteen DPT student volunteers from 2 institutions across 4 campuses in 4 states.

Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study using thematic analysis with semistructured interviews was used to gather student perspectives regarding factors that positively and negatively affect sense of belonging. Three researchers qualitatively analyzed transcriptions using a combination of open and axial coding to identify themes.

Results: Final consensus coding yielded 179 coded responses across 95 unique codes categorized in 6 themes: faculty and staff relationships, program policies and procedures, cohort and peer relationships, diverse identities, communication, and program resources.

Discussion and conclusion: This is the first study known to investigate the use of student voice to better understand, operationalize, and potentially improve belonging within DPT education. Results demonstrate that when given a voice, students are able to articulate both observations of present-state sense of belonging and clear ideas and recommendations for ways in which DPT programs could address sense of belonging. Findings may help frame program policies and procedures from the student lens by offering themes, strategies, and recommendations for promoting a culture of belonging.

直接从源头:物理治疗博士学生对项目政策和程序对归属感的影响的观点。
引言:迫切需要为具有不同背景和需求的个人增加获得和纳入卫生专业教育计划的机会。本研究的目的是探索学生对当前物理治疗博士(DPT)项目政策、程序和实践可能促进或阻碍归属感文化和参与不同学生身份和需求的能力的方式的看法。文献综述:迄今为止,在促进和支持卫生专业学生归属方面没有最佳实践,并且在文献中没有学生的声音。这促使需要指导学术DPT项目在哪里以及如何在他们自我评估其符合新修订的认证标准的程度时集中精力。参与者:来自4个州4个校区2个机构的16名DPT学生志愿者。方法:采用主题分析和半结构化访谈的横断面定性研究方法,收集学生对影响归属感的积极因素和消极因素的看法。三位研究人员使用开放编码和轴向编码的组合对转录进行定性分析,以确定主题。结果:最终的共识编码产生了179个编码响应,涉及95个独特的代码,分为6个主题:教师和员工关系、项目政策和程序、队列和同伴关系、不同的身份、沟通和项目资源。讨论和结论:这是已知的第一个调查使用学生的声音来更好地理解、操作和潜在地改善DPT教育中的归属感的研究。结果表明,当给予发言权时,学生能够清晰地表达对当前状态归属感的观察,并就DPT项目如何解决归属感的方式提出清晰的想法和建议。研究结果可以通过提供主题、策略和促进归属感文化的建议,从学生的角度来帮助制定项目政策和程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信