Four-class ASME BCI: investigation of the feasibility and comparison of two strategies for multiclassing.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1461960
Simon Kojima, Shin'ichiro Kanoh
{"title":"Four-class ASME BCI: investigation of the feasibility and comparison of two strategies for multiclassing.","authors":"Simon Kojima, Shin'ichiro Kanoh","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1461960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ASME (stands for Auditory Stream segregation Multiclass ERP) paradigm is proposed and used for an auditory brain-computer interface (BCI). In this paradigm, a sequence of sounds that are perceived as multiple auditory streams are presented simultaneously, and each stream is an oddball sequence. The users are requested to focus selectively on deviant stimuli in one of the streams, and the target of the user attention is detected by decoding event-related potentials (ERPs). To achieve multiclass ASME BCI, the number of streams must be increased. However, increasing the number of streams is not easy because of a person's limited audible frequency range. One method to achieve multiclass ASME with a limited number of streams is to increase the target stimuli in a single stream.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two approaches for the ASME paradigm, ASME-4stream (four streams with a single target stimulus in each stream) and ASME-2stream (two streams with two target stimuli in each stream) were investigated. Fifteen healthy subjects with no neurological disorders participated in this study. An electroencephalogram was acquired, and ERPs were analyzed. The binary classification and BCI simulation (detecting the target class of the trial out of four) were conducted with the help of linear discriminant analysis, and its performance was evaluated offline. Its usability and workload were also evaluated using a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Discriminative ERPs were elicited in both paradigms. The average accuracies of the BCI simulations were 0.83 (ASME-4stream) and 0.86 (ASME-2stream). In the ASME-2stream paradigm, the latency and the amplitude of P300 were shorter and larger, the average binary classification accuracy was higher, and the average weighted workload was smaller.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Both four-class ASME paradigms achieved a sufficiently high accuracy (over 80%). The shorter latency and larger amplitude of P300 and the smaller workload indicated that subjects could perform the task confidently and had high usability in ASME-2stream compared to ASME-4stream paradigm. A paradigm with multiple target stimuli in a single stream could create a multiclass ASME BCI with limited streams while maintaining task difficulty. These findings expand the potential for an ASME BCI multiclass extension, offering practical auditory BCI choices for users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1461960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1461960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The ASME (stands for Auditory Stream segregation Multiclass ERP) paradigm is proposed and used for an auditory brain-computer interface (BCI). In this paradigm, a sequence of sounds that are perceived as multiple auditory streams are presented simultaneously, and each stream is an oddball sequence. The users are requested to focus selectively on deviant stimuli in one of the streams, and the target of the user attention is detected by decoding event-related potentials (ERPs). To achieve multiclass ASME BCI, the number of streams must be increased. However, increasing the number of streams is not easy because of a person's limited audible frequency range. One method to achieve multiclass ASME with a limited number of streams is to increase the target stimuli in a single stream.

Methods: Two approaches for the ASME paradigm, ASME-4stream (four streams with a single target stimulus in each stream) and ASME-2stream (two streams with two target stimuli in each stream) were investigated. Fifteen healthy subjects with no neurological disorders participated in this study. An electroencephalogram was acquired, and ERPs were analyzed. The binary classification and BCI simulation (detecting the target class of the trial out of four) were conducted with the help of linear discriminant analysis, and its performance was evaluated offline. Its usability and workload were also evaluated using a questionnaire.

Results: Discriminative ERPs were elicited in both paradigms. The average accuracies of the BCI simulations were 0.83 (ASME-4stream) and 0.86 (ASME-2stream). In the ASME-2stream paradigm, the latency and the amplitude of P300 were shorter and larger, the average binary classification accuracy was higher, and the average weighted workload was smaller.

Discussion: Both four-class ASME paradigms achieved a sufficiently high accuracy (over 80%). The shorter latency and larger amplitude of P300 and the smaller workload indicated that subjects could perform the task confidently and had high usability in ASME-2stream compared to ASME-4stream paradigm. A paradigm with multiple target stimuli in a single stream could create a multiclass ASME BCI with limited streams while maintaining task difficulty. These findings expand the potential for an ASME BCI multiclass extension, offering practical auditory BCI choices for users.

四类ASME BCI:两种多分类策略的可行性研究与比较。
本文提出了听觉流分离多类ERP (Auditory Stream segregation Multiclass ERP)范式,并将其应用于听觉脑机接口(BCI)。在这个范例中,声音序列被视为多个听觉流同时呈现,每个听觉流都是一个奇怪的序列。要求用户选择性地关注其中一个流中的异常刺激,并通过解码事件相关电位(erp)来检测用户注意的目标。为了实现多类ASME BCI,必须增加流的数量。然而,增加流的数量并不容易,因为一个人的可听频率范围有限。用有限数量的流实现多类ASME的一种方法是在单个流中增加目标刺激。方法:研究ASME范式的两种方法,ASME-4stream(四个流,每个流中有一个目标刺激)和ASME-2stream(两个流,每个流中有两个目标刺激)。15名无神经系统疾病的健康受试者参加了本研究。获得脑电图,并分析erp。借助线性判别分析进行二值分类和BCI仿真(四次试验中检测目标类),并离线评价其性能。还使用问卷对其可用性和工作量进行了评估。结果:在两种范式下均可诱发歧视性erp。BCI模拟的平均精度分别为0.83 (ASME-4stream)和0.86 (ASME-2stream)。在ASME-2stream范式中,P300的潜伏期和振幅更短、更大,平均二值分类准确率更高,平均加权工作量更小。讨论:这两种四类ASME范式都达到了足够高的准确度(超过80%)。P300的潜伏期短、幅度大、工作量小,表明被试在asme -2流中比在asme -4流中更自信地完成任务,具有较高的可用性。在单一流中具有多个目标刺激的范式可以在保持任务难度的情况下,创建具有有限流的多类ASME脑机接口。这些发现扩大了ASME脑机接口多类别扩展的潜力,为用户提供了实用的听觉脑机接口选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信