Development, Content Validity, and Reliability of the Physical Therapy Social Determinants of Health Scale.

Rupal M Patel, Zachary D Rethorn, Elise N Bjork
{"title":"Development, Content Validity, and Reliability of the Physical Therapy Social Determinants of Health Scale.","authors":"Rupal M Patel, Zachary D Rethorn, Elise N Bjork","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study describes the development, content validity, and reliability of the Physical Therapy Social Determinants of Health Scale (PT-SDHS), in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Addressing inequities stemming from the social determinants of health (SDOH) is critical for providing effective clinical care and improving population health. Currently, no tool exists to assess DPT students' education or competence with SDOH.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Recruited domain experts were licensed health professionals, had a peer-reviewed publication on SDOH, and had at least 3 years of experience with SDOH. A convenience sample of DPT students was also recruited from multiple cohorts at 2 universities in multiple geographic locations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Association for Medical Education in Europe best practices for developing questionnaires for educational research guided development of the PT-SDHS. Eight experts established content validity through item- and scale-content validity index measures and modified Kappa statistics. Qualitative data determined clarity and comprehensiveness. Construct validity and scale reliability were determined using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PT-SDHS showed high item content validity (range: 0.86-1) and scale content validity (S-CVI/UA = 0.83; S-CVI/Ave = 0.98). After expert validation, the PT-SDHS consisted of 30 items with 5 ordinal answer choices. Factor analysis of 254 DPT student responses revealed 4 content domains with a factor loading greater than 0.4. Two items did not load onto any of the factors, and 2 items were cross-loaded onto multiple factors, so they were removed, leaving a scale of 26 items. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.74 (satisfactory) to 0.96 (excellent) across the 4 factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The PT-SDHS is the first psychometrically valid and reliable instrument related to educating DPT students on 4 SDOH domains: Knowledge, Attitudes, Personal Barriers, and Beliefs About Others. This tool could aid development and assessment of SDOH educational interventions for health care students.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study describes the development, content validity, and reliability of the Physical Therapy Social Determinants of Health Scale (PT-SDHS), in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students.

Review of literature: Addressing inequities stemming from the social determinants of health (SDOH) is critical for providing effective clinical care and improving population health. Currently, no tool exists to assess DPT students' education or competence with SDOH.

Subjects: Recruited domain experts were licensed health professionals, had a peer-reviewed publication on SDOH, and had at least 3 years of experience with SDOH. A convenience sample of DPT students was also recruited from multiple cohorts at 2 universities in multiple geographic locations.

Methods: The Association for Medical Education in Europe best practices for developing questionnaires for educational research guided development of the PT-SDHS. Eight experts established content validity through item- and scale-content validity index measures and modified Kappa statistics. Qualitative data determined clarity and comprehensiveness. Construct validity and scale reliability were determined using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha.

Results: The PT-SDHS showed high item content validity (range: 0.86-1) and scale content validity (S-CVI/UA = 0.83; S-CVI/Ave = 0.98). After expert validation, the PT-SDHS consisted of 30 items with 5 ordinal answer choices. Factor analysis of 254 DPT student responses revealed 4 content domains with a factor loading greater than 0.4. Two items did not load onto any of the factors, and 2 items were cross-loaded onto multiple factors, so they were removed, leaving a scale of 26 items. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.74 (satisfactory) to 0.96 (excellent) across the 4 factors.

Discussion and conclusion: The PT-SDHS is the first psychometrically valid and reliable instrument related to educating DPT students on 4 SDOH domains: Knowledge, Attitudes, Personal Barriers, and Beliefs About Others. This tool could aid development and assessment of SDOH educational interventions for health care students.

物理治疗健康社会决定因素量表的编制、内容效度及信度。
前言:本研究描述了物理治疗博士(DPT)学生健康社会决定因素量表(PT-SDHS)的编制、内容效度和信度。文献综述:解决由健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)引起的不公平现象对于提供有效的临床护理和改善人口健康至关重要。目前,没有工具来评估DPT学生的教育程度或SDOH能力。研究对象:招募的领域专家是有执照的卫生专业人员,在SDOH方面发表过同行评议的出版物,并具有至少3年的SDOH经验。我们还从不同地理位置的两所大学的多个队列中招募了DPT学生作为方便样本。方法:欧洲医学教育协会制定教育研究问卷的最佳实践指导PT-SDHS的开发。8位专家通过项目和量表-内容效度指标测量和修改Kappa统计建立了内容效度。定性数据决定了清晰度和全面性。采用探索性因子分析和Cronbach’s alpha法确定结构效度和量表信度。结果:PT-SDHS具有较高的项目内容效度(范围:0.86-1)和量表内容效度(S-CVI/UA = 0.83;S-CVI/Ave = 0.98)。经专家验证,PT-SDHS由30个题目组成,5个顺序答案选项。对254名DPT学生的问卷进行因子分析,发现有4个内容域的因子负荷大于0.4。有两个项目没有加载到任何一个因素上,有两个项目交叉加载到多个因素上,因此它们被删除,留下26个项目的量表。4个因素的Cronbach's alpha值范围为0.74(满意)至0.96(极好)。讨论与结论:PT-SDHS是第一个心理测量学上有效和可靠的工具,涉及对DPT学生进行4个SDOH领域的教育:知识、态度、个人障碍和对他人的信念。该工具可以帮助制定和评估卫生保健学生的SDOH教育干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信