Equity Landscape in Healthcare Quality: A Mixed-Methods Study of Efforts Within Surgical Quality Programs.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jessica K Liu, Courtney E Collins, Anoosha Moturu, Karen Pollitt, Lillian S Kao, Bonnie S Mason, Avery Nathens, Clifford Y Ko
{"title":"Equity Landscape in Healthcare Quality: A Mixed-Methods Study of Efforts Within Surgical Quality Programs.","authors":"Jessica K Liu, Courtney E Collins, Anoosha Moturu, Karen Pollitt, Lillian S Kao, Bonnie S Mason, Avery Nathens, Clifford Y Ko","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing equity in healthcare is necessary to improve population health outcomes. In doing so, a requisite level of foundational resources, organization, and processes is needed. Although increasing attention is being devoted to addressing health inequity, the current landscape supporting these efforts remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the presence of frontline resources, organization, and processes for support of health equity efforts in hospitals participating in American College of Surgeons (ACS) quality programs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using a mixed-methods design of online surveys and semistructured interviews, we evaluated hospitals with ACS quality programs. Descriptive analytics were applied to survey results; interview transcripts were coded using an inductive approach. Data and methods were triangulated to report key findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 44 programs invited, 36% completed the survey. Five site program leaders were interviewed. All program leaders reported having a strategy at the institution level for supporting equity efforts and having processes in place for reporting instances of discrimination, mistreatment, or harassment. Survey results demonstrated deficient workforce capacity, lack of engagement, and insufficient organization-negatively impacting efforts. The key themes from interviews were (1) implementation occurred primarily and superficially at the institutional level; (2) barriers to implementation included preemptive structure, lack of prioritization, and insufficient disparity data; and (3) opportunities included enhancing leadership and staff buy-in, increasing available resources, developing health equity champions, and defining clear strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts aimed at achieving health equity exist but lack the necessary infrastructure, organization, and processes to support effective frontline practices. The findings from this study support consideration of standards development targeting problems and opportunities at both the institutional and program levels for advancing equity in quality improvement efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"220-229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Addressing equity in healthcare is necessary to improve population health outcomes. In doing so, a requisite level of foundational resources, organization, and processes is needed. Although increasing attention is being devoted to addressing health inequity, the current landscape supporting these efforts remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the presence of frontline resources, organization, and processes for support of health equity efforts in hospitals participating in American College of Surgeons (ACS) quality programs.

Study design: Using a mixed-methods design of online surveys and semistructured interviews, we evaluated hospitals with ACS quality programs. Descriptive analytics were applied to survey results; interview transcripts were coded using an inductive approach. Data and methods were triangulated to report key findings.

Results: Of the 44 programs invited, 36% completed the survey. Five site program leaders were interviewed. All program leaders reported having a strategy at the institution level for supporting equity efforts and having processes in place for reporting instances of discrimination, mistreatment, or harassment. Survey results demonstrated deficient workforce capacity, lack of engagement, and insufficient organization-negatively impacting efforts. The key themes from interviews were (1) implementation occurred primarily and superficially at the institutional level; (2) barriers to implementation included preemptive structure, lack of prioritization, and insufficient disparity data; and (3) opportunities included enhancing leadership and staff buy-in, increasing available resources, developing health equity champions, and defining clear strategies.

Conclusions: Efforts aimed at achieving health equity exist but lack the necessary infrastructure, organization, and processes to support effective frontline practices. The findings from this study support consideration of standards development targeting problems and opportunities at both the institutional and program levels for advancing equity in quality improvement efforts.

医疗保健质量的公平景观:外科质量项目中努力的混合方法研究。
背景:解决医疗保健中的公平问题是改善人口健康结果所必需的。在此过程中,需要必要的基础资源、组织和流程。尽管人们越来越关注解决医疗不公平问题,但目前支持这些努力的情况仍不为人知。我们试图评估参与美国外科医师学会(ACS)质量计划的医院是否拥有支持健康公平工作的一线资源、组织和流程:研究设计:我们采用在线调查和半结构式访谈的混合方法,对参与 ACS 质量计划的医院进行了评估。我们对调查结果进行了描述性分析,并采用归纳法对访谈记录进行了编码。我们对数据和方法进行了三角测量,以报告主要发现:在受邀的 44 个项目中,有 36% 完成了调查。五位项目负责人接受了访谈。所有项目负责人都表示,在机构层面有支持公平工作的战略,并有报告歧视、虐待或骚扰事件的流程。调查结果显示,劳动力能力不足、缺乏参与和组织不力--对工作产生了负面影响。访谈的关键主题是1)实施工作主要在机构层面进行,而且流于表面;2)实施工作的障碍包括先发制人的结构、缺乏优先次序以及差异数据不足;3)机遇包括加强领导层和员工的认同、增加可用资源、培养健康公平倡导者以及定义明确的战略:旨在实现健康公平的努力是存在的,但缺乏必要的基础设施、组织和流程来支持有效的一线实践。本研究的结果支持考虑针对机构和项目层面的问题和机遇制定标准,以推进质量改进工作中的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信