Diagnostic performance of FibroTouch® in assessing hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: An Asian experience.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Thanikan Sukaram, Soe Thiha Maung, Yuda Chongpison, Tassanan Jaihan, Chonlada Phathong, Roongruedee Chaiteerakij
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of FibroTouch® in assessing hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: An Asian experience.","authors":"Thanikan Sukaram, Soe Thiha Maung, Yuda Chongpison, Tassanan Jaihan, Chonlada Phathong, Roongruedee Chaiteerakij","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>FibroTouch® has shown efficacy in staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B, but its performance in assessing liver steatosis and fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients remains understudied. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FibroTouch® in assessing steatosis and fibrosis in the MASLD population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Liver stiffness measurements and steatosis were assessed using FibroTouch® and FibroScan®, with FibroScan® as the reference standard. Pearson's correlation test evaluated correlations, and kappa statistics determined agreement between the two methods. Optimal cut-off values of FibroTouch® for predicting hepatic steatosis and fibrosis stages were determined through ROC curve analysis with the Youden index method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were observed between FibroTouch® UAP and FibroScan® CAP (rho=0.74) and LSM values (rho=0.87) (p < 0.001 for both) in a total of 380 patients. The mean CAP value for the entire cohort was 285 ± 51 dB/m, and the median LSM for the cohort was 5 .3kPa. The optimal FibroTouch® UAP cutoffs were 229 dB/m for S0 vs. S1, 267 dB/m for S1 vs. S2, and 294 dB/m for S2 vs. S3. For FibroTouch® LSM, the optimal cutoffs were 6.0 kPa for F0-F1 vs. F2, 7.9 kPa for F2 vs. F3, and 10.6 kPa for F3 vs. F4. Moreover, FibroTouch® effectively assessed hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with different BMIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FibroTouch® proved valuable in assessing hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis staging in MASLD patients, enhancing its applicability in various clinical settings as a suitable and convenient option for MASLD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"101753"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: FibroTouch® has shown efficacy in staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B, but its performance in assessing liver steatosis and fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients remains understudied. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FibroTouch® in assessing steatosis and fibrosis in the MASLD population.

Materials and methods: Liver stiffness measurements and steatosis were assessed using FibroTouch® and FibroScan®, with FibroScan® as the reference standard. Pearson's correlation test evaluated correlations, and kappa statistics determined agreement between the two methods. Optimal cut-off values of FibroTouch® for predicting hepatic steatosis and fibrosis stages were determined through ROC curve analysis with the Youden index method.

Results: Strong correlations were observed between FibroTouch® UAP and FibroScan® CAP (rho=0.74) and LSM values (rho=0.87) (p < 0.001 for both) in a total of 380 patients. The mean CAP value for the entire cohort was 285 ± 51 dB/m, and the median LSM for the cohort was 5 .3kPa. The optimal FibroTouch® UAP cutoffs were 229 dB/m for S0 vs. S1, 267 dB/m for S1 vs. S2, and 294 dB/m for S2 vs. S3. For FibroTouch® LSM, the optimal cutoffs were 6.0 kPa for F0-F1 vs. F2, 7.9 kPa for F2 vs. F3, and 10.6 kPa for F3 vs. F4. Moreover, FibroTouch® effectively assessed hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with different BMIs.

Conclusions: FibroTouch® proved valuable in assessing hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis staging in MASLD patients, enhancing its applicability in various clinical settings as a suitable and convenient option for MASLD patients.

简介和目的:FibroTouch® 在对慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者的肝纤维化进行分期方面已显示出疗效,但其在评估代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)患者肝脏脂肪变性和纤维化方面的性能仍未得到充分研究。我们的目的是评估 FibroTouch® 在评估 MASLD 患者脂肪变性和肝纤维化方面的诊断性能:使用 FibroTouch® 和 FibroScan® 评估肝脏硬度测量值和脂肪变性,FibroScan® 作为参考标准。皮尔逊相关性检验评估了相关性,卡帕统计确定了两种方法之间的一致性。通过采用尤登指数法进行 ROC 曲线分析,确定了 FibroTouch® 预测肝脂肪变性和肝纤维化分期的最佳临界值:结果:FibroTouch® UAP 与 FibroScan® CAP 值(rho=0.74)和 LSM 值(rho=0.87)(pConclusions:事实证明,FibroTouch® 在评估 MASLD 患者的肝脂肪变性和肝纤维化分期方面很有价值,它作为 MASLD 患者的一种合适而方便的选择,提高了其在各种临床环境中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信