Survival outcomes of Durvalumab in combination to cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced biliary tract cancer: real world results from a single Italian institution.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1159/000541891
Margherita Rimini, Silvia Foti, Silvia Camera, Federico Rossari, Francesco Vitiello, Federica Lo Prinzi, Luca Aldrighetti, Francesco De Cobelli, Federica Pedica, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Mara Persano, Stefano Cascinu, Andrea Casadei-Gardini
{"title":"Survival outcomes of Durvalumab in combination to cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced biliary tract cancer: real world results from a single Italian institution.","authors":"Margherita Rimini, Silvia Foti, Silvia Camera, Federico Rossari, Francesco Vitiello, Federica Lo Prinzi, Luca Aldrighetti, Francesco De Cobelli, Federica Pedica, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Mara Persano, Stefano Cascinu, Andrea Casadei-Gardini","doi":"10.1159/000541891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine plus durvalumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 patients were enrolled. Median OS was NR and median PFS was 7.6 months, after a median follow up of 13.5 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 34.5 %, with stable disease in 53.0 % of patients. High baseline CEA levels were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97 % of patients. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 16 % (grade >2: 6 %). Presence of TP53 mutation was related to a worse OS, conversely the presence of ARID1A genomic alteration was related to a better PFS. A tendence toward a better OS was found for BRCAness patients which did not reach the statistical significance. On the other hand, BRCAness patients showed significantly higher PFS compared to no BRCAness patients Conclusion: This real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes.

Methods: We included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine plus durvalumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results: 33 patients were enrolled. Median OS was NR and median PFS was 7.6 months, after a median follow up of 13.5 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 34.5 %, with stable disease in 53.0 % of patients. High baseline CEA levels were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97 % of patients. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 16 % (grade >2: 6 %). Presence of TP53 mutation was related to a worse OS, conversely the presence of ARID1A genomic alteration was related to a better PFS. A tendence toward a better OS was found for BRCAness patients which did not reach the statistical significance. On the other hand, BRCAness patients showed significantly higher PFS compared to no BRCAness patients Conclusion: This real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信