Implementing Goals of Care Notes in a Statewide Health System: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shilpee Sinha, Shannon Countryman, Ami Patel, Chelsea Powell, James E Slaven, Amber R Comer, Alexia M Torke
{"title":"Implementing Goals of Care Notes in a Statewide Health System: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Shilpee Sinha, Shannon Countryman, Ami Patel, Chelsea Powell, James E Slaven, Amber R Comer, Alexia M Torke","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.11.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Goals of Care (GOC) documentation for seriously ill patients is integral to patient-centered care but not standardized. Collaborative efforts within the health system to improve the frequency and documentation of GOC to communicate patient preferences and values are essential to ensure both quality of life and quality of death.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>We created a standard GOC note type and location in the electronic medical record (EMR) for a large, statewide health system in the Midwest. Utilization and note content for all unique GOC note types documented in the first year were reviewed. A framework of GOC topics including treatment plan, prognosis, patient preferences and values, and quality of life was used to review the note content. Demographic data and outcomes including death during the observation period and hospice enrollment were also collected.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>In the first year, 934 GOC notes were documented. Palliative care (PC) clinicians addressed more GOC fields compared to other clinicians (70% v. 31%, p <.0001) and had earlier discussions (median 19 days before death v. 4 days, p<.0001). Hospice was discussed more by PC (50% vs 27%, p=.0001) and PC discussions were followed by higher hospice enrollments before death (50% vs 35% p=.0166).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We successfully implemented a standard EMR location for GOC notes which improved GOC documentation across a state health care system and found variations and gaps in fields addressed by all clinicians as well as key differences between PC clinicians vs other clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.11.029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Goals of Care (GOC) documentation for seriously ill patients is integral to patient-centered care but not standardized. Collaborative efforts within the health system to improve the frequency and documentation of GOC to communicate patient preferences and values are essential to ensure both quality of life and quality of death.

Measures: We created a standard GOC note type and location in the electronic medical record (EMR) for a large, statewide health system in the Midwest. Utilization and note content for all unique GOC note types documented in the first year were reviewed. A framework of GOC topics including treatment plan, prognosis, patient preferences and values, and quality of life was used to review the note content. Demographic data and outcomes including death during the observation period and hospice enrollment were also collected.

Outcomes: In the first year, 934 GOC notes were documented. Palliative care (PC) clinicians addressed more GOC fields compared to other clinicians (70% v. 31%, p <.0001) and had earlier discussions (median 19 days before death v. 4 days, p<.0001). Hospice was discussed more by PC (50% vs 27%, p=.0001) and PC discussions were followed by higher hospice enrollments before death (50% vs 35% p=.0166).

Conclusions: We successfully implemented a standard EMR location for GOC notes which improved GOC documentation across a state health care system and found variations and gaps in fields addressed by all clinicians as well as key differences between PC clinicians vs other clinicians.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信