{"title":"Enhancing psychological assessment and treatment of chronic pain: A research agenda for personalized and process-based approaches","authors":"Saskia Scholten, Julia Anna Glombiewski","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The heterogeneity of chronic pain and stagnating improvements in treatment effectiveness have prompted calls for a shift toward personalized and process-based approaches to the assessment and treatment of chronic pain. As this opens a new line of research, several fundamental questions arise. We begin by defining key terms and reviewing attempts to personalize treatment to date. Despite progress in personalization, long-term effects remain unclear. Existing studies are limited by group-based approaches that overlook individual variability. Future research should use idiographic methods and process-based therapy to tailor interventions to individual needs. A person- and process-oriented research agenda is needed that combines ambulatory assessment, network modeling, and single-case designs to advance personalized treatments for chronic pain and improve clinical decision-making.","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The heterogeneity of chronic pain and stagnating improvements in treatment effectiveness have prompted calls for a shift toward personalized and process-based approaches to the assessment and treatment of chronic pain. As this opens a new line of research, several fundamental questions arise. We begin by defining key terms and reviewing attempts to personalize treatment to date. Despite progress in personalization, long-term effects remain unclear. Existing studies are limited by group-based approaches that overlook individual variability. Future research should use idiographic methods and process-based therapy to tailor interventions to individual needs. A person- and process-oriented research agenda is needed that combines ambulatory assessment, network modeling, and single-case designs to advance personalized treatments for chronic pain and improve clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology