[Sensitivity and specificity of epidemiological criteria for the case definition of congenital syphilis in a retrospective cohort in BrazilSensibilidad y especificidad de los criterios epidemiológicos para la definición de los casos de sífilis congénita en una cohorte retrospectiva en Brasil].

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fabiana Ferreira Dos Santos, Lisiane Morelia Weide Acosta, Clécio Homrich da Silva
{"title":"[Sensitivity and specificity of epidemiological criteria for the case definition of congenital syphilis in a retrospective cohort in BrazilSensibilidad y especificidad de los criterios epidemiológicos para la definición de los casos de sífilis congénita en una cohorte retrospectiva en Brasil].","authors":"Fabiana Ferreira Dos Santos, Lisiane Morelia Weide Acosta, Clécio Homrich da Silva","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2024.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the modified criteria for case definition of congenital syphilis implemented in 2017, which excluded treatment of the sexual partner as a necessary condition for adequate maternal treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study involved epidemiological monitoring of 503 children born in 2018 and living in Porto Alegre, Brazil: 412, including miscarriages and stillbirths, had been reported as congenital syphilis cases; 91, who had been exposed to syphilis during pregnancy, were no longer considered cases after partner treatment was excluded as a criterion for adequate maternal treatment. The study involved observation of treatment at birth, laboratory follow-up with non-treponemal tests up to age 18 months or treponemal tests after age 18 months, and symptom-based screening for cohort closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 286 cases and 126 non-cases were identified using the criteria for reportable cases. Among those exposed but who did not meet the criteria for reportable cases, three cases and 88 non-cases were identified <i>(p</i> < 0.001). Considering the current case definition of congenital syphilis for reporting purposes, the sensitivity was 98.9% (95%CI: 97.0 to 99.7), and the specificity, 41.0% (95%CI: 34.4 to 48.0). The monitoring strategy for case closure had a sensitivity of 69.4% (95%CI: 64.7 to 73.8) and a specificity of 96.7% (95%CI: 90.7 to 99.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current case definition of congenital syphilis case for reporting purposes proved sensitive, but less specific. We suggest that it be reviewed in light of the possibility of missing true-positive diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 ","pages":"e133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the modified criteria for case definition of congenital syphilis implemented in 2017, which excluded treatment of the sexual partner as a necessary condition for adequate maternal treatment.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved epidemiological monitoring of 503 children born in 2018 and living in Porto Alegre, Brazil: 412, including miscarriages and stillbirths, had been reported as congenital syphilis cases; 91, who had been exposed to syphilis during pregnancy, were no longer considered cases after partner treatment was excluded as a criterion for adequate maternal treatment. The study involved observation of treatment at birth, laboratory follow-up with non-treponemal tests up to age 18 months or treponemal tests after age 18 months, and symptom-based screening for cohort closure.

Results: A total of 286 cases and 126 non-cases were identified using the criteria for reportable cases. Among those exposed but who did not meet the criteria for reportable cases, three cases and 88 non-cases were identified (p < 0.001). Considering the current case definition of congenital syphilis for reporting purposes, the sensitivity was 98.9% (95%CI: 97.0 to 99.7), and the specificity, 41.0% (95%CI: 34.4 to 48.0). The monitoring strategy for case closure had a sensitivity of 69.4% (95%CI: 64.7 to 73.8) and a specificity of 96.7% (95%CI: 90.7 to 99.3).

Conclusion: The current case definition of congenital syphilis case for reporting purposes proved sensitive, but less specific. We suggest that it be reviewed in light of the possibility of missing true-positive diagnoses.

[巴西回顾性队列中先天性梅毒病例定义的流行病学标准的敏感性和特异性]
目的:评价2017年修订的先天性梅毒病例定义标准的敏感性和特异性,该标准将性伴侣的治疗排除在母体充分治疗的必要条件之外。方法:本回顾性队列研究涉及对2018年出生并生活在巴西阿雷格里港的503名儿童进行流行病学监测:412名儿童(包括流产和死产)报告为先天性梅毒病例;在排除伴侣治疗作为适当产妇治疗的标准后,91名在怀孕期间接触过梅毒的妇女不再被视为病例。该研究包括出生时的治疗观察,18个月前或18个月后进行非螺旋体检测的实验室随访,以及基于症状的队列关闭筛查。结果:采用报告病例标准,共发现286例,未发现126例。在暴露但不符合报告病例标准的人中,确定了3例病例和88例非病例(p < 0.001)。考虑到目前报告目的的先天性梅毒病例定义,敏感性为98.9% (95%CI: 97.0 ~ 99.7),特异性为41.0% (95%CI: 34.4 ~ 48.0)。病例关闭监测策略的敏感性为69.4% (95%CI: 64.7 ~ 73.8),特异性为96.7% (95%CI: 90.7 ~ 99.3)。结论:目前用于报告目的的先天性梅毒病例定义是敏感的,但缺乏特异性。我们建议根据遗漏真阳性诊断的可能性对其进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信