{"title":"Assessing e-scooter rider safety perceptions in shared spaces: Evidence from a video experiment in Sweden.","authors":"Khashayar Kazemzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared spaces prioritise the role of micromobility in urban environments by separating vulnerable road users from motorised vehicles, aiming to enhance both actual and perceived safety. However, the presence of various transport modes, such as pedestrians, cyclists and e-scooters, with differing navigation behaviours, increases the heterogeneity of these spaces and impacts the perception of safety. Despite the increasing use of e-scooters, the safety perceptions of e-scooter riders remain largely underexplored in the literature. In response, I conducted an online video experiment and polled 920 e-scooter users in Sweden to assess their safety perceptions when interacting exclusively with cyclists. I collected data on socio-demographics, travel habits, crash history, and responses to hypothetical video scenarios depicting interactions in shared spaces, where e-scooter riders overtake or meet cyclists. I then employed a random effect latent class ordered logit model to quantify the determinants of e-scooter riders' safety perceptions. The findings indicate that women feel less safe in shared spaces compared to men. Additionally, the direction of encounters significantly affected young adults, who perceived meeting other users as more unsafe than overtaking them. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in safety perceptions, emphasise the significant role of demographic variables in understanding users' safety perceptions, and reinforce the need for inclusive design of shared spaces for all road users.</p>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"211 ","pages":"107874"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107874","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Shared spaces prioritise the role of micromobility in urban environments by separating vulnerable road users from motorised vehicles, aiming to enhance both actual and perceived safety. However, the presence of various transport modes, such as pedestrians, cyclists and e-scooters, with differing navigation behaviours, increases the heterogeneity of these spaces and impacts the perception of safety. Despite the increasing use of e-scooters, the safety perceptions of e-scooter riders remain largely underexplored in the literature. In response, I conducted an online video experiment and polled 920 e-scooter users in Sweden to assess their safety perceptions when interacting exclusively with cyclists. I collected data on socio-demographics, travel habits, crash history, and responses to hypothetical video scenarios depicting interactions in shared spaces, where e-scooter riders overtake or meet cyclists. I then employed a random effect latent class ordered logit model to quantify the determinants of e-scooter riders' safety perceptions. The findings indicate that women feel less safe in shared spaces compared to men. Additionally, the direction of encounters significantly affected young adults, who perceived meeting other users as more unsafe than overtaking them. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in safety perceptions, emphasise the significant role of demographic variables in understanding users' safety perceptions, and reinforce the need for inclusive design of shared spaces for all road users.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.