Assessing e-scooter rider safety perceptions in shared spaces: Evidence from a video experiment in Sweden.

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Khashayar Kazemzadeh
{"title":"Assessing e-scooter rider safety perceptions in shared spaces: Evidence from a video experiment in Sweden.","authors":"Khashayar Kazemzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared spaces prioritise the role of micromobility in urban environments by separating vulnerable road users from motorised vehicles, aiming to enhance both actual and perceived safety. However, the presence of various transport modes, such as pedestrians, cyclists and e-scooters, with differing navigation behaviours, increases the heterogeneity of these spaces and impacts the perception of safety. Despite the increasing use of e-scooters, the safety perceptions of e-scooter riders remain largely underexplored in the literature. In response, I conducted an online video experiment and polled 920 e-scooter users in Sweden to assess their safety perceptions when interacting exclusively with cyclists. I collected data on socio-demographics, travel habits, crash history, and responses to hypothetical video scenarios depicting interactions in shared spaces, where e-scooter riders overtake or meet cyclists. I then employed a random effect latent class ordered logit model to quantify the determinants of e-scooter riders' safety perceptions. The findings indicate that women feel less safe in shared spaces compared to men. Additionally, the direction of encounters significantly affected young adults, who perceived meeting other users as more unsafe than overtaking them. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in safety perceptions, emphasise the significant role of demographic variables in understanding users' safety perceptions, and reinforce the need for inclusive design of shared spaces for all road users.</p>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"211 ","pages":"107874"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107874","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared spaces prioritise the role of micromobility in urban environments by separating vulnerable road users from motorised vehicles, aiming to enhance both actual and perceived safety. However, the presence of various transport modes, such as pedestrians, cyclists and e-scooters, with differing navigation behaviours, increases the heterogeneity of these spaces and impacts the perception of safety. Despite the increasing use of e-scooters, the safety perceptions of e-scooter riders remain largely underexplored in the literature. In response, I conducted an online video experiment and polled 920 e-scooter users in Sweden to assess their safety perceptions when interacting exclusively with cyclists. I collected data on socio-demographics, travel habits, crash history, and responses to hypothetical video scenarios depicting interactions in shared spaces, where e-scooter riders overtake or meet cyclists. I then employed a random effect latent class ordered logit model to quantify the determinants of e-scooter riders' safety perceptions. The findings indicate that women feel less safe in shared spaces compared to men. Additionally, the direction of encounters significantly affected young adults, who perceived meeting other users as more unsafe than overtaking them. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in safety perceptions, emphasise the significant role of demographic variables in understanding users' safety perceptions, and reinforce the need for inclusive design of shared spaces for all road users.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信