Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Compound Myopic Astigmatism Between VisuMax and VISUMAX 800.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-11-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S492552
Aadithreya Varman, Arulmozhi Varman, Dinesh Balakumar
{"title":"Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Compound Myopic Astigmatism Between VisuMax and VISUMAX 800.","authors":"Aadithreya Varman, Arulmozhi Varman, Dinesh Balakumar","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S492552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the visual outcomes of keratorefractive lenticule extraction using a new version of a femtosecond laser platform with semi-automated cyclotorsion compensation in comparison to the previous generation without cyclotorsion control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an ambispective study of consecutive eyes treated by SMILE with the VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 femtosecond lasers at the Uma Eye clinic, Chennai, India between June 2022 and July 2023. Inclusion criteria were myopia up to -10 D and astigmatism between 1.5 D and 5 D. Data was retrospectively collected from patients that underwent SMILE using the VisuMax without cyclotorsion compensation and prospectively collected from patients undergoing SMILE using the VISUMAX 800 with Oculign and Centralign software aids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was collected from a total of 220 eyes that underwent routine SMILE; 115 eyes with VisuMax (VM500 group) and 105 eyes with VISUMAX 800 (VM800 group). The mean attempted spherical equivalent was -4.82±2.16 D in the VM500 group and -4.80±2.24 in the VM800 group. At the 3-month postoperative visit, 94% of eyes in the VM500 group and 98% of eyes in the VM800 group had an UDVA of 20/20 or better. Accuracy of the SEQ showed that 71% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 100% were within ±1.00 D of target in the VM500 group and 96% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 100% were within ±1.00 D of target in the VM800 group. There were no reported cases of suction loss or any other intraoperative complication in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMILE with the VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 provided excellent visual and refractive outcomes for subjects with myopic astigmatism. The VISUMAX 800, using Oculign and Centralign aids, demonstrated better accuracy when correcting cylinder greater than 2 D compared to the VisuMax without using manual cyclotorsion compensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3557-3566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S492552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcomes of keratorefractive lenticule extraction using a new version of a femtosecond laser platform with semi-automated cyclotorsion compensation in comparison to the previous generation without cyclotorsion control.

Methods: This was an ambispective study of consecutive eyes treated by SMILE with the VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 femtosecond lasers at the Uma Eye clinic, Chennai, India between June 2022 and July 2023. Inclusion criteria were myopia up to -10 D and astigmatism between 1.5 D and 5 D. Data was retrospectively collected from patients that underwent SMILE using the VisuMax without cyclotorsion compensation and prospectively collected from patients undergoing SMILE using the VISUMAX 800 with Oculign and Centralign software aids.

Results: Data was collected from a total of 220 eyes that underwent routine SMILE; 115 eyes with VisuMax (VM500 group) and 105 eyes with VISUMAX 800 (VM800 group). The mean attempted spherical equivalent was -4.82±2.16 D in the VM500 group and -4.80±2.24 in the VM800 group. At the 3-month postoperative visit, 94% of eyes in the VM500 group and 98% of eyes in the VM800 group had an UDVA of 20/20 or better. Accuracy of the SEQ showed that 71% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 100% were within ±1.00 D of target in the VM500 group and 96% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 100% were within ±1.00 D of target in the VM800 group. There were no reported cases of suction loss or any other intraoperative complication in either group.

Conclusion: SMILE with the VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 provided excellent visual and refractive outcomes for subjects with myopic astigmatism. The VISUMAX 800, using Oculign and Centralign aids, demonstrated better accuracy when correcting cylinder greater than 2 D compared to the VisuMax without using manual cyclotorsion compensation.

VisuMax与VisuMax 800复合近视散光角膜屈光透镜提取术视力及屈光效果比较
目的:评价使用新型飞秒激光平台进行角膜屈光性晶状体提取的视觉效果,该平台具有半自动旋扭补偿功能,并与上一代无旋扭控制的飞秒激光平台进行比较。方法:对2022年6月至2023年7月在印度金奈乌玛眼科诊所使用VisuMax和VisuMax 800飞秒激光器进行SMILE治疗的连续眼睛进行双视角研究。纳入标准为近视至-10 D,散光在1.5 D至5 D之间。数据回顾性收集使用无旋回补偿VisuMax进行SMILE的患者,前瞻性收集使用VisuMax 800配合Oculign和Centralign软件辅助进行SMILE的患者。结果:共收集220只常规SMILE眼的数据;115只眼睛使用VisuMax (VM500组),105只眼睛使用VisuMax 800 (VM800组)。VM500组和VM800组的平均尝试球形当量分别为-4.82±2.16 D和-4.80±2.24 D。术后3个月随访时,VM500组94%的眼睛和VM800组98%的眼睛UDVA为20/20或更好。VM500组有71%的眼睛在目标的±0.50 D范围内,100%在目标的±1.00 D范围内;VM800组有96%的眼睛在目标的±0.50 D范围内,100%在目标的±1.00 D范围内。两组均未出现吸力丢失或其他术中并发症。结论:SMILE配用VisuMax和VisuMax 800对近视散光患者有良好的视力和屈光效果。使用Oculign和Centralign辅助工具的VISUMAX 800在校正大于2维的圆柱体时,与不使用手动回旋扭转补偿的VISUMAX相比,显示出更好的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信