Evaluating a Community-Based Walking Program: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Community Capacity.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lindsay Spitz, Roy Valenzuela, Jennifer J Salinas
{"title":"Evaluating a Community-Based Walking Program: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Community Capacity.","authors":"Lindsay Spitz, Roy Valenzuela, Jennifer J Salinas","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2023-0286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Border Coalition for Fitness (BCF) is a university-community-based partnership that aims to improve physical activity rates in El Paso, Texas, via walking challenges. This mixed-methods program evaluation assessed the BCF's efforts to expand the El Paso community's capacity to support physical activity through the walking challenge campaign. Informants were divided between members, which was subdivided into BCF members and team captains, and walking challenge participants. Informants completed demographic and community capacity questionnaires that assessed 3 constructs: leadership (L), resources (R), and ability, and commitment to organizing action (C). Participants for this study were recruited by email through participant and member listservs. Of the 2000 participants with active emails, 102 agreed to participate. Quantitative results (n = 102) revealed high ratings across all constructs; however, BCF members consistently rated each construct higher than team captains (members L: 9.71; R: 9.50; C: 9.36 vs community leadership L: 7.97; R: 7.72; C: 7.59). BCF members (n = 5) and former walking challenge participants (n = 3) completed semistructured interviews. While qualitative results revealed BCF leadership is effective, programming is appropriately resourced, and the BCF does drives sustainable action in the community, there were areas the participants identify as areas that needed improvement. Specifically, participants felt that membership recruitment and retention should be improved, and that membership should include more community members and challenge participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2023-0286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Border Coalition for Fitness (BCF) is a university-community-based partnership that aims to improve physical activity rates in El Paso, Texas, via walking challenges. This mixed-methods program evaluation assessed the BCF's efforts to expand the El Paso community's capacity to support physical activity through the walking challenge campaign. Informants were divided between members, which was subdivided into BCF members and team captains, and walking challenge participants. Informants completed demographic and community capacity questionnaires that assessed 3 constructs: leadership (L), resources (R), and ability, and commitment to organizing action (C). Participants for this study were recruited by email through participant and member listservs. Of the 2000 participants with active emails, 102 agreed to participate. Quantitative results (n = 102) revealed high ratings across all constructs; however, BCF members consistently rated each construct higher than team captains (members L: 9.71; R: 9.50; C: 9.36 vs community leadership L: 7.97; R: 7.72; C: 7.59). BCF members (n = 5) and former walking challenge participants (n = 3) completed semistructured interviews. While qualitative results revealed BCF leadership is effective, programming is appropriately resourced, and the BCF does drives sustainable action in the community, there were areas the participants identify as areas that needed improvement. Specifically, participants felt that membership recruitment and retention should be improved, and that membership should include more community members and challenge participants.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信