Patient-reported questionnaires to preoperatively identify high-risk surgical patients.

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q2 SURGERY

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03560-0

Renske Meijer, David W G Ten Cate, Bart C Bongers, Marta Regis, Hans H C M Savelberg, Gerrit D Slooter, Stef Janssen, Martijn van Hooff, Goof Schep

{"title":"Patient-reported questionnaires to preoperatively identify high-risk surgical patients.","authors":"Renske Meijer, David W G Ten Cate, Bart C Bongers, Marta Regis, Hans H C M Savelberg, Gerrit D Slooter, Stef Janssen, Martijn van Hooff, Goof Schep","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03560-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major surgery. Assessing CRF preoperatively, by measuring peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), is valuable yet not widely available. This study aimed to assess whether questionnaires could be used preoperatively to identify high-risk surgical patients.Methods: Healthy participants and patients who underwent CPET completed the FitMáx, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), the modified 4-questions DASI (M-DASI-4Q), Veterans-Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ), and Metabolic Equivalents of Task (MET) questionnaire. Questionnaire-VO2peak was compared with CPET-VO2peak. Overall performance of the questionnaires was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Furthermore, corresponding to the Youden index or pre-specified levels, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were determined.Results: In total, 361 participants were included. All questionnaires showed high AUC values to identify high-risk patients, defined on the basis of CPET-VO2peak thresholds. FitMáx and VSAQ demonstrated superior results compared to the other questionnaires. Based on the Youden index, the optimal questionnaire-VO2peak cut-off values were 20.6, 21.3, and 26.1 ml·kg-1·min-1 for the FitMáx and 16.3, 18.2, and 20.4 ml·kg-1·min-1 for the VSAQ corresponding to the VO2peak thresholds 16.0, 18.2 and 24.5 ml·kg-1·min-1 respectively.Conclusion: The ability to identify high-risk surgical patients preoperatively (defined by the CPET-VO2peak thresholds) by the FitMáx and the VSAQ indicates that they could be used to identify high-risk surgical patients. Patients with a poor predicted VO2peak ≤ 21.3 and ≤ 18.2 ml·kg-1·min-1, respectively for FitMáx and VSAQ, should be referred to formal preoperative (cardiopulmonary) exercise testing.Trial registration: The study was registered as NL-OMON23304 in the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands, retrospectively at 28-04-2020.","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03560-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major surgery. Assessing CRF preoperatively, by measuring peak oxygen uptake (VO_2peak) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), is valuable yet not widely available. This study aimed to assess whether questionnaires could be used preoperatively to identify high-risk surgical patients.

Methods: Healthy participants and patients who underwent CPET completed the FitMáx, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), the modified 4-questions DASI (M-DASI-4Q), Veterans-Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ), and Metabolic Equivalents of Task (MET) questionnaire. Questionnaire-VO_2peak was compared with CPET-VO_2peak. Overall performance of the questionnaires was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Furthermore, corresponding to the Youden index or pre-specified levels, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were determined.

Results: In total, 361 participants were included. All questionnaires showed high AUC values to identify high-risk patients, defined on the basis of CPET-VO_2peak thresholds. FitMáx and VSAQ demonstrated superior results compared to the other questionnaires. Based on the Youden index, the optimal questionnaire-VO_2peak cut-off values were 20.6, 21.3, and 26.1 ml·kg^-1·min^-1 for the FitMáx and 16.3, 18.2, and 20.4 ml·kg^-1·min^-1 for the VSAQ corresponding to the VO_2peak thresholds 16.0, 18.2 and 24.5 ml·kg^-1·min^-1 respectively.

Conclusion: The ability to identify high-risk surgical patients preoperatively (defined by the CPET-VO_2peak thresholds) by the FitMáx and the VSAQ indicates that they could be used to identify high-risk surgical patients. Patients with a poor predicted VO_2peak ≤ 21.3 and ≤ 18.2 ml·kg^-1·min^-1, respectively for FitMáx and VSAQ, should be referred to formal preoperative (cardiopulmonary) exercise testing.

Trial registration: The study was registered as NL-OMON23304 in the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands, retrospectively at 28-04-2020.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

8.70%

发文量

342

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.