An Early Snapshot of Attitudes Toward Generative Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy Education.

Richard Severin, Kendra Gagnon
{"title":"An Early Snapshot of Attitudes Toward Generative Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy Education.","authors":"Richard Severin, Kendra Gagnon","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining popularity across health care, education, and society. The purpose of this study was to assess perceptions and use of generative AI in academic physical therapy (PT).</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Generative AI became one of the fastest-growing technologies ever after the public release of ChatGPT in November 2022. Early data indicate that attitudes toward generative AI in higher education are mixed and rapidly evolving, with significant ethical concerns around use and potential misuse. There are no published studies investigating perceptions and use of generative AI in PT education.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 175 surveys were completed and analyzed. Respondents included PT educators, administrators, and students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous, online survey on use and perception of AI was distributed through email and social media. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations were performed to analyze respondent characteristics and responses to survey questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents (61.1%) reported they did not use generative AI during the 2022-2023 academic year, whereas 35.4% were generative AI users. More than 40% of respondents were optimistic or very optimistic toward generative AI. Users of AI were more likely to report an optimistic or very optimistic disposition toward AI compared with nonusers. AI users were more likely to agree or completely agree that generative AI has more benefits than drawbacks compared with nonusers.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Results of this survey suggest that, despite the rapid uptake of generative AI in society, many PT educators and students harbor reservations and uncertainties toward its use. Artificial intelligence users were less likely to hold negative perceptions toward it and were more likely to find it useful. Understanding use and perceptions of generative AI in PT education may inform strategies to promote innovation, policy-making, and ethical integration of this new and rapidly evolving technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining popularity across health care, education, and society. The purpose of this study was to assess perceptions and use of generative AI in academic physical therapy (PT).

Review of literature: Generative AI became one of the fastest-growing technologies ever after the public release of ChatGPT in November 2022. Early data indicate that attitudes toward generative AI in higher education are mixed and rapidly evolving, with significant ethical concerns around use and potential misuse. There are no published studies investigating perceptions and use of generative AI in PT education.

Subjects: A total of 175 surveys were completed and analyzed. Respondents included PT educators, administrators, and students.

Methods: An anonymous, online survey on use and perception of AI was distributed through email and social media. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations were performed to analyze respondent characteristics and responses to survey questions.

Results: Most respondents (61.1%) reported they did not use generative AI during the 2022-2023 academic year, whereas 35.4% were generative AI users. More than 40% of respondents were optimistic or very optimistic toward generative AI. Users of AI were more likely to report an optimistic or very optimistic disposition toward AI compared with nonusers. AI users were more likely to agree or completely agree that generative AI has more benefits than drawbacks compared with nonusers.

Discussion and conclusion: Results of this survey suggest that, despite the rapid uptake of generative AI in society, many PT educators and students harbor reservations and uncertainties toward its use. Artificial intelligence users were less likely to hold negative perceptions toward it and were more likely to find it useful. Understanding use and perceptions of generative AI in PT education may inform strategies to promote innovation, policy-making, and ethical integration of this new and rapidly evolving technology.

对生成式人工智能在物理治疗教育中的态度的早期快照。
导读:生成式人工智能(AI)在医疗保健、教育和社会领域迅速普及。本研究的目的是评估生成式人工智能在学术物理治疗(PT)中的认知和使用。文献综述:自2022年11月ChatGPT公开发布以来,生成人工智能成为发展最快的技术之一。早期数据表明,高等教育中对生成式人工智能的态度好坏参半,而且正在迅速演变,人们对人工智能的使用和潜在滥用存在重大的伦理担忧。没有发表的研究调查认知和使用生成人工智能在PT教育。对象:共完成175份调查并进行分析。受访者包括体育教育工作者、管理人员和学生。方法:通过电子邮件和社交媒体对人工智能的使用和感知进行匿名在线调查。描述性统计和交叉表格分析受访者的特征和对调查问题的回答。结果:大多数受访者(61.1%)表示,他们在2022-2023学年没有使用生成式人工智能,而35.4%的受访者是生成式人工智能用户。超过40%的受访者对生成式人工智能持乐观或非常乐观的态度。与不使用人工智能的人相比,人工智能的用户更有可能对人工智能持乐观或非常乐观的态度。与非用户相比,人工智能用户更有可能同意或完全同意生成式人工智能的好处多于缺点。讨论和结论:本调查的结果表明,尽管生成式人工智能在社会上迅速普及,但许多PT教育者和学生对其使用持保留态度和不确定性。人工智能用户不太可能对它持负面看法,更有可能觉得它很有用。理解生成式人工智能在体育教育中的使用和认知,可以为促进这种快速发展的新技术的创新、政策制定和伦理整合提供策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信