COMPARISON OF BACTERIAL PROBIOTICS (BIFIDOBACTERIUM AND LACTOBACILLUS) VERSUS FUNGAL PROBIOTICS (SACCHAROMYCES) IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN AGED 6 MONTHS TO 5 YEARS.

Safar Ali Shah, Samia Naz, Fazaila Jabeen, Muhammad Adnan Rashid, Abdul Rahman, Zeeshan Khan
{"title":"COMPARISON OF BACTERIAL PROBIOTICS (BIFIDOBACTERIUM AND LACTOBACILLUS) VERSUS FUNGAL PROBIOTICS (SACCHAROMYCES) IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN AGED 6 MONTHS TO 5 YEARS.","authors":"Safar Ali Shah, Samia Naz, Fazaila Jabeen, Muhammad Adnan Rashid, Abdul Rahman, Zeeshan Khan","doi":"10.55519/JAMC-03-13464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute diarrhoea among children mainly due to infection must be treated prophylactically to reduce mortality. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of using bacterial probiotics (Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) versus fungal probiotics (Saccharomyces) for acute diarrhoea among children aged 6 months to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-randomized control trial was conducted at diarrhoea ward, the Children's Hospital, Lahore from 1st March 2022 to 1st March 2024. 200 children were recruited in the study using non-probability consecutive sampling technique which were divided equally into two groups receiving either bacterial probiotics or fungal probiotics. The children were followed up till resolution of diarrhoea. Diarrhoeal duration and stool frequency were noted. Data was entered and analysed using SPSS Version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 200 children, 52.5% were male and 47.5% were female. Mean age of the sample was 2.24±1.54 years, mean baseline and follow up diarrhoea duration was 3.52±1.44 and 3.47±1.25 days and stool frequency at follow up was 3.75±1.15. Complete diarrhoeal resolution was seen among 95% of the children using bacterial probiotics while 87% of the children using fungal probiotics (p=0.048). Regarding diarrhoeal duration (days) among the two groups, the mean was 3.11±1.36 (bacterial probiotic group) and 3.88±1.02 (fungal probiotic group) (p<0.001) and regarding stool frequency, the mean was 2.97±0.55 (bacterial probiotic group) and 4.57±1.07 (fungal probiotic group) (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It can be concluded from this study that diarrhoeal resolution along with stool frequency was better among children using bacterial probiotics as compared to those using fungal probiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":517395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","volume":"36 3","pages":"537-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-13464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute diarrhoea among children mainly due to infection must be treated prophylactically to reduce mortality. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of using bacterial probiotics (Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) versus fungal probiotics (Saccharomyces) for acute diarrhoea among children aged 6 months to 5 years.

Methods: A non-randomized control trial was conducted at diarrhoea ward, the Children's Hospital, Lahore from 1st March 2022 to 1st March 2024. 200 children were recruited in the study using non-probability consecutive sampling technique which were divided equally into two groups receiving either bacterial probiotics or fungal probiotics. The children were followed up till resolution of diarrhoea. Diarrhoeal duration and stool frequency were noted. Data was entered and analysed using SPSS Version 26.

Results: Out of 200 children, 52.5% were male and 47.5% were female. Mean age of the sample was 2.24±1.54 years, mean baseline and follow up diarrhoea duration was 3.52±1.44 and 3.47±1.25 days and stool frequency at follow up was 3.75±1.15. Complete diarrhoeal resolution was seen among 95% of the children using bacterial probiotics while 87% of the children using fungal probiotics (p=0.048). Regarding diarrhoeal duration (days) among the two groups, the mean was 3.11±1.36 (bacterial probiotic group) and 3.88±1.02 (fungal probiotic group) (p<0.001) and regarding stool frequency, the mean was 2.97±0.55 (bacterial probiotic group) and 4.57±1.07 (fungal probiotic group) (p<0.001).

Conclusions: It can be concluded from this study that diarrhoeal resolution along with stool frequency was better among children using bacterial probiotics as compared to those using fungal probiotics.

细菌益生菌(双歧杆菌和乳酸菌)与真菌益生菌(酵母菌)治疗6个月至5岁儿童急性腹泻的比较
背景:主要由感染引起的儿童急性腹泻必须进行预防性治疗以降低死亡率。本研究的目的是比较使用细菌益生菌(双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌)和真菌益生菌(酵母菌)治疗6个月至5岁儿童急性腹泻的效果。方法:于2022年3月1日至2024年3月1日在拉合尔儿童医院腹泻病房进行非随机对照试验。采用非概率连续抽样技术招募了200名儿童,将他们平均分为两组,分别服用细菌益生菌和真菌益生菌。对孩子们进行随访,直到腹泻消失为止。记录了腹泻持续时间和大便频率。数据输入和分析使用SPSS版本26。结果:200例患儿中男性占52.5%,女性占47.5%。样本的平均年龄为2.24±1.54岁,平均基线和随访腹泻时间分别为3.52±1.44天和3.47±1.25天,随访时大便次数为3.75±1.15。95%使用细菌益生菌的儿童腹泻完全消失,87%使用真菌益生菌的儿童腹泻完全消失(p=0.048)。两组儿童腹泻持续时间平均为3.11±1.36天(细菌益生菌组)和3.88±1.02天(真菌益生菌组)。结论:本研究结果表明,使用细菌益生菌组儿童腹泻消退和大便次数明显优于使用真菌益生菌组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信