ASSOCIATION OF CONSANGUINITY WITH RECURRENT FOETAL LOSS.

Romana Irshad, Muhammad Adnan Rashid, Abeera Farooq
{"title":"ASSOCIATION OF CONSANGUINITY WITH RECURRENT FOETAL LOSS.","authors":"Romana Irshad, Muhammad Adnan Rashid, Abeera Farooq","doi":"10.55519/JAMC-03-13860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 25% of all recognized pregnancies result in foetal loss. Women who will experience two consecutive foetal loss is less than 5%, while loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies in the first trimester, termed as Recurrent foetal loss (RFL), occurs in 1% of all pregnancies. RFL is often associated with cousin marriages. Keeping in view the social and psychological burden associated with RFL, it deems necessary to conduct further studies, to clear this ambiguity about the adverse effect of consanguinity on the foetal loss. The study was done with the objective to ascertain association of consanguinity with recurrent foetal loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 432 individual were recruited in this case control study (216 each in case and control groups) and was conducted at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) Rawalpindi. The Cases consist of women having recurrent foetal loss while controls were women who do not experience recurrent foetal loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cases had mean parity level of 5.13 while controls 4.02. The difference in parity level of both cases and controls was statistically significant. The mean live births for all the participants were 2.35±1.915 ranging from 0-7. The cases had 0.72 mean live births while controls had 3.98 mean live births. The cases and controls were compared for consanguinity, i.e., if they had a blood relationship with their husbands. 67 (31.01%) of the cases had consanguinity while 62 (28.70%) of the controls had consanguinity. There was no statistically significant difference among cases and controls in terms of consanguinity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our study does not show any significant harmful effect of consanguinity on foetal outcome, however more in-depth research is required to look for genetic loci which are contributing to the causation of RFL, especially those inherited recessively, since homozygosity is increased in consanguinity.</p>","PeriodicalId":517395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","volume":"36 3","pages":"487-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-13860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 25% of all recognized pregnancies result in foetal loss. Women who will experience two consecutive foetal loss is less than 5%, while loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies in the first trimester, termed as Recurrent foetal loss (RFL), occurs in 1% of all pregnancies. RFL is often associated with cousin marriages. Keeping in view the social and psychological burden associated with RFL, it deems necessary to conduct further studies, to clear this ambiguity about the adverse effect of consanguinity on the foetal loss. The study was done with the objective to ascertain association of consanguinity with recurrent foetal loss.

Methods: A total of 432 individual were recruited in this case control study (216 each in case and control groups) and was conducted at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) Rawalpindi. The Cases consist of women having recurrent foetal loss while controls were women who do not experience recurrent foetal loss.

Results: The Cases had mean parity level of 5.13 while controls 4.02. The difference in parity level of both cases and controls was statistically significant. The mean live births for all the participants were 2.35±1.915 ranging from 0-7. The cases had 0.72 mean live births while controls had 3.98 mean live births. The cases and controls were compared for consanguinity, i.e., if they had a blood relationship with their husbands. 67 (31.01%) of the cases had consanguinity while 62 (28.70%) of the controls had consanguinity. There was no statistically significant difference among cases and controls in terms of consanguinity.

Conclusions: Although our study does not show any significant harmful effect of consanguinity on foetal outcome, however more in-depth research is required to look for genetic loci which are contributing to the causation of RFL, especially those inherited recessively, since homozygosity is increased in consanguinity.

血亲关系与复发性胎儿丢失的关系。
背景:在所有确认的妊娠中,约有25%导致胎儿丢失。连续两次胎儿丢失的妇女不到5%,而在妊娠早期连续三次或更多的妊娠丢失,称为复发性胎儿丢失(RFL),发生在所有妊娠的1%。RFL通常与表亲婚姻有关。考虑到与非近亲流产有关的社会和心理负担,委员会认为有必要进行进一步的研究,以澄清关于近亲流产对胎儿损失不利影响的含糊不清。该研究的目的是确定亲属关系与复发性胎儿丢失。方法:在拉瓦尔品第武装部队病理研究所(AFIP)共招募了432名个体作为病例对照研究(病例组和对照组各216名)。这些病例包括复发性胎儿丢失的妇女,而对照组是没有复发性胎儿丢失的妇女。结果:病例的平均胎次水平为5.13,对照组为4.02。病例与对照组的胎次水平差异有统计学意义。所有参与者的平均活产数为2.35±1.915,范围为0-7。病例平均活产0.72例,对照组平均活产3.98例。这些病例和对照组的血缘关系进行了比较,即她们是否与丈夫有血缘关系。有亲属关系者67例(31.01%),对照组有亲属关系者62例(28.70%)。在亲属关系方面,病例与对照组之间无统计学差异。结论:虽然我们的研究没有发现血缘关系对胎儿结局有明显的有害影响,但由于血缘关系增加了纯合性,因此需要更深入的研究来寻找导致RFL的基因位点,特别是隐性遗传的基因位点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信