Diagnostic performance of a point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay among Chinese patients with chest pain.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jonathan Ka Ming Ho, Janet Yuen Ha Wong, Gary Tse, Andy Chun Yin Chong, Calvin Chi Wai Chau, Chi Yip Wong, Johnson Wai Keung Tse, Jeremy Yan Hon Tam, Simon Ching Lam
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of a point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay among Chinese patients with chest pain.","authors":"Jonathan Ka Ming Ho, Janet Yuen Ha Wong, Gary Tse, Andy Chun Yin Chong, Calvin Chi Wai Chau, Chi Yip Wong, Johnson Wai Keung Tse, Jeremy Yan Hon Tam, Simon Ching Lam","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A novel handheld point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I analyser has recently been introduced to the market. Evaluating its diagnostic performance against laboratory standards is imperative, given the variations in cardiac troponin levels across populations. This study compared the diagnostic performance between the point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay (Siemens Healthineers Atellica VTLi) and a laboratory high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay (Abbott ARCHITECT STAT High Sensitive Troponin-I) performed using blood samples from various populations (overall, male, female, younger and older) of Chinese patients with chest pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 585 consecutive Chinese patients (age ≥18 year) who presented to an emergency department with chest pain (lasting >5 min) and were managed following the chest pain protocol between 1 August 2023 and 12 June 2024. For both assays, blood samples were collected at two time points (0 hour (initial) and 3 hour (subsequent)). The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of the two assays, evaluated with their 99th percentile upper reference limits used as the cut-off values for diagnosing myocardial infarction. The gold standard for comparison was the final diagnoses made by attending physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The point-of-care and laboratory assays exhibited equivalent sensitivity and negative predictive values (both 100%) for blood samples collected at both time points. However, the point-of-care assay outperformed the laboratory assay in terms of specificity (initial: 90.5% to 96.3% vs 79.8% to 94.7%; subsequent: 87.8% to 94.8% vs 77.7% to 92.4%) and positive predictive value (initial: 24.4% to 30.8% vs 11.6% to 23.5%; subsequent: 12.5% to 25.0% vs 5.9% to 18.8%), particularly in older patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The point-of-care assay is recommended for rapid clinical decision-making. Future studies should explore the effects of its integration into clinical practice and the feasibility of using sex-race-age-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits to enhance its diagnostic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A novel handheld point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I analyser has recently been introduced to the market. Evaluating its diagnostic performance against laboratory standards is imperative, given the variations in cardiac troponin levels across populations. This study compared the diagnostic performance between the point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay (Siemens Healthineers Atellica VTLi) and a laboratory high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay (Abbott ARCHITECT STAT High Sensitive Troponin-I) performed using blood samples from various populations (overall, male, female, younger and older) of Chinese patients with chest pain.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 585 consecutive Chinese patients (age ≥18 year) who presented to an emergency department with chest pain (lasting >5 min) and were managed following the chest pain protocol between 1 August 2023 and 12 June 2024. For both assays, blood samples were collected at two time points (0 hour (initial) and 3 hour (subsequent)). The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of the two assays, evaluated with their 99th percentile upper reference limits used as the cut-off values for diagnosing myocardial infarction. The gold standard for comparison was the final diagnoses made by attending physicians.

Results: The point-of-care and laboratory assays exhibited equivalent sensitivity and negative predictive values (both 100%) for blood samples collected at both time points. However, the point-of-care assay outperformed the laboratory assay in terms of specificity (initial: 90.5% to 96.3% vs 79.8% to 94.7%; subsequent: 87.8% to 94.8% vs 77.7% to 92.4%) and positive predictive value (initial: 24.4% to 30.8% vs 11.6% to 23.5%; subsequent: 12.5% to 25.0% vs 5.9% to 18.8%), particularly in older patients.

Conclusion: The point-of-care assay is recommended for rapid clinical decision-making. Future studies should explore the effects of its integration into clinical practice and the feasibility of using sex-race-age-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits to enhance its diagnostic performance.

一种即时高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白I检测在中国胸痛患者中的诊断性能
背景:一种新型的手持式护理点高灵敏度心脏肌钙蛋白I分析仪最近被引入市场。鉴于人群中心肌肌钙蛋白水平的差异,根据实验室标准评估其诊断性能是必要的。本研究比较了现场高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白I检测(Siemens Healthineers Atellica VTLi)和实验室高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白I检测(Abbott ARCHITECT STAT High Sensitive troponin -I)的诊断性能,该检测使用了来自不同人群(男性、女性、年轻人和老年人)的中国胸痛患者的血液样本。方法:本横断面研究纳入585例连续的中国患者(年龄≥18岁),这些患者在2023年8月1日至2024年6月12日期间因胸痛(持续bbbb5分钟)就诊于急诊科,并按照胸痛方案进行治疗。对于这两种检测,在两个时间点(0小时(初始)和3小时(后续))采集血样。主要结果是两种检测的诊断性能,以其99个百分位上限作为诊断心肌梗死的临界值进行评估。比较的黄金标准是主治医生做出的最终诊断。结果:护理点和实验室检测在两个时间点采集的血液样本显示出相同的敏感性和阴性预测值(均为100%)。然而,在特异性方面,即时检测优于实验室检测(初始:90.5%至96.3% vs 79.8%至94.7%;后续:87.8%至94.8% vs 77.7%至92.4%)和阳性预测值(初始:24.4%至30.8% vs 11.6%至23.5%;后续:12.5% - 25.0% vs 5.9% - 18.8%),特别是在老年患者中。结论:在临床快速决策中推荐使用即时检测法。未来的研究应探讨将其纳入临床实践的效果,以及使用性别、种族、年龄特异性的第99百分位上限来提高其诊断效能的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信