Real-world impact of high-pitch helical CT on radiation exposure and image quality in infants being evaluated for cardiothoracic pathologies.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1007/s00247-024-06115-z
Joshua G Hunter, Kaustav Bera, Leslie Ciancibello, Syed Muhammad Awais Bukhari, Jennifer Sposato, Kianoush Ansari Gilani, Robert Gilkeson, Amit Gupta
{"title":"Real-world impact of high-pitch helical CT on radiation exposure and image quality in infants being evaluated for cardiothoracic pathologies.","authors":"Joshua G Hunter, Kaustav Bera, Leslie Ciancibello, Syed Muhammad Awais Bukhari, Jennifer Sposato, Kianoush Ansari Gilani, Robert Gilkeson, Amit Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06115-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of cardiothoracic pathologies is a common indication for computed tomography (CT) in infants. However, CT is fraught with challenges specific to the patient population, such as increased sensitivity to radiation and inability to remain stationary during imaging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates potential advantages of a high-pitch helical CT protocol for infants with cardiothoracic pathologies. Namely, we evaluate whether a high-pitch helical CT protocol can minimize radiation exposure without compromising image quality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 98 consecutive cardiac protocol CT examinations of infants (56 males, 42 females; mean age 3.3 ± 2.8 months) performed at a tube voltage of 80 kV between 2016 and 2022. Forty-seven examinations were acquired with a non-gated conventional helical protocol on a multi-detector CT scanner (control group) and 51 were acquired with a non-gated high-pitch helical protocol on a dual-source CT scanner (high-pitch (HP) group). Patient characteristics, radiation exposure parameters, and imaging datasets were extracted from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Image quality was assessed subjectively by two radiologists who independently assigned ratings, and objectively through attenuation measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiation exposure was approximately 75% lower in the HP group (0.54 mSv vs. 2.46 mSv, P < .001). HP examinations demonstrated comparable, or better, image quality across all metrics in both subjective and objective analyses. In the subjective analysis, the HP group achieved superior ratings for visualization of the aorta (P = .04). In the objective analysis, the HP group achieved superior signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the left atrium (P < .001), left ventricle (P = .04), and aorta (P = .003), and superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the left atrium (P = .003) and aorta (P = .009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that employing high-pitch helical CT protocols for evaluation of cardiothoracic pathologies in infants decreases radiation exposure while achieving similar to slightly better image quality compared to conventional helical CT protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06115-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of cardiothoracic pathologies is a common indication for computed tomography (CT) in infants. However, CT is fraught with challenges specific to the patient population, such as increased sensitivity to radiation and inability to remain stationary during imaging.

Objective: This study investigates potential advantages of a high-pitch helical CT protocol for infants with cardiothoracic pathologies. Namely, we evaluate whether a high-pitch helical CT protocol can minimize radiation exposure without compromising image quality.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 98 consecutive cardiac protocol CT examinations of infants (56 males, 42 females; mean age 3.3 ± 2.8 months) performed at a tube voltage of 80 kV between 2016 and 2022. Forty-seven examinations were acquired with a non-gated conventional helical protocol on a multi-detector CT scanner (control group) and 51 were acquired with a non-gated high-pitch helical protocol on a dual-source CT scanner (high-pitch (HP) group). Patient characteristics, radiation exposure parameters, and imaging datasets were extracted from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Image quality was assessed subjectively by two radiologists who independently assigned ratings, and objectively through attenuation measurements.

Results: Radiation exposure was approximately 75% lower in the HP group (0.54 mSv vs. 2.46 mSv, P < .001). HP examinations demonstrated comparable, or better, image quality across all metrics in both subjective and objective analyses. In the subjective analysis, the HP group achieved superior ratings for visualization of the aorta (P = .04). In the objective analysis, the HP group achieved superior signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the left atrium (P < .001), left ventricle (P = .04), and aorta (P = .003), and superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the left atrium (P = .003) and aorta (P = .009).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that employing high-pitch helical CT protocols for evaluation of cardiothoracic pathologies in infants decreases radiation exposure while achieving similar to slightly better image quality compared to conventional helical CT protocols.

高音高螺旋CT对婴儿辐射暴露和图像质量的实际影响正在评估胸心病。
背景:评估胸心病理是婴儿计算机断层扫描(CT)的常见指征。然而,CT充满了特定于患者群体的挑战,例如对辐射的敏感性增加以及在成像期间无法保持静止。目的:本研究探讨高音高螺旋CT对婴幼儿心胸病变的潜在优势。也就是说,我们评估高间距螺旋CT方案是否可以在不影响图像质量的情况下最大限度地减少辐射暴露。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括98例连续心脏CT检查的婴儿(男56例,女42例;平均年龄3.3±2.8个月),2016年至2022年在80kv管电压下进行。在多探测器CT扫描仪上使用非门控常规螺旋协议进行了47例检查(对照组),在双源CT扫描仪上使用非门控高螺距螺旋协议进行了51例检查(高螺距(HP)组)。从图像存档和通信系统(PACS)中提取患者特征、辐射暴露参数和成像数据集。图像质量由两名独立分配评分的放射科医生主观上评估,并通过衰减测量客观评估。结果:HP组的辐射暴露大约低75% (0.54 mSv vs. 2.46 mSv, P)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与传统的螺旋CT方案相比,采用高分辨率螺旋CT方案评估婴儿心胸病变减少了辐射暴露,同时获得了类似的略好的图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信