Effectiveness of Two Wavelengths of Diode Laser and Amorphous Calcium Phosphate-Casein Phosphopeptide Mousse in the Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Study.

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/1257136
Manjusha Nambiar, Bhavya Shetty, Ibrahim Fazal, Safiya Fatima Khan, Mehul A Shah, Vignesh Kamath, Shahaziya Faruk, Vaishnavi Jalaj, Sowmya N
{"title":"Effectiveness of Two Wavelengths of Diode Laser and Amorphous Calcium Phosphate-Casein Phosphopeptide Mousse in the Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Study.","authors":"Manjusha Nambiar, Bhavya Shetty, Ibrahim Fazal, Safiya Fatima Khan, Mehul A Shah, Vignesh Kamath, Shahaziya Faruk, Vaishnavi Jalaj, Sowmya N","doi":"10.1155/ijod/1257136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> In office methods for immediate relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) has long been an area of research. This study compared the efficacy of 660 nm diode laser, 980 nm diode laser, and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide (ACP-CPP) agent in the treatment of DH. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 39 patients with minimum three hypersensitive teeth in at least one quadrant were selected and randomly divided into three groups; Group A, B, and C patients were treated by 660 nm diode laser, 980 nm diode laser, and ACP-CPP agent, respectively. All the hypersensitive teeth were stimulated with tactile; thermal and air stimuli, and the pretreatment and posttreatment hypersensitivity scores were evaluated with the numeric rating scale (NRS) at baseline, 30 min, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the uniformity of the data. The Chi-square (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>) test of significance was used to compare proportions. For intergroup comparison, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test were utilized. <b>Results:</b> At 30 min and 1 week, the 980 nm laser was more effective than the 660 nm laser, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. Throughout the trial period, the 660 nm and 980 nm diode lasers were more effective than the ACP-CPP agent in lowering DH. <b>Conclusions:</b> 660 nm diode laser, 980 nm diode laser, and ACP-CPP agent showed positive prospective as effective desensitizers when utilized as a clinical procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1257136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/1257136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In office methods for immediate relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) has long been an area of research. This study compared the efficacy of 660 nm diode laser, 980 nm diode laser, and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide (ACP-CPP) agent in the treatment of DH. Materials and Methods: A total of 39 patients with minimum three hypersensitive teeth in at least one quadrant were selected and randomly divided into three groups; Group A, B, and C patients were treated by 660 nm diode laser, 980 nm diode laser, and ACP-CPP agent, respectively. All the hypersensitive teeth were stimulated with tactile; thermal and air stimuli, and the pretreatment and posttreatment hypersensitivity scores were evaluated with the numeric rating scale (NRS) at baseline, 30 min, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the uniformity of the data. The Chi-square (χ 2) test of significance was used to compare proportions. For intergroup comparison, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test were utilized. Results: At 30 min and 1 week, the 980 nm laser was more effective than the 660 nm laser, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. Throughout the trial period, the 660 nm and 980 nm diode lasers were more effective than the ACP-CPP agent in lowering DH. Conclusions: 660 nm diode laser, 980 nm diode laser, and ACP-CPP agent showed positive prospective as effective desensitizers when utilized as a clinical procedure.

两波长二极管激光联合非晶磷酸钙-酪蛋白磷酸肽慕斯治疗牙本质过敏的随机临床研究。
目的:即刻缓解牙本质过敏(DH)的临床方法一直是一个研究领域。本研究比较了660 nm二极管激光、980 nm二极管激光和无定形磷酸钙-酪蛋白磷酸肽(ACP-CPP)剂治疗DH的疗效。材料与方法:选取至少一象限至少三颗超敏牙的患者39例,随机分为三组;A、B、C组患者分别采用660 nm二极管激光、980 nm二极管激光和ACP-CPP药物治疗。所有超敏牙均用触觉刺激;采用数值评定量表(NRS)在基线、30分钟、1周、1个月、3个月和6个月对热刺激和空气刺激以及治疗前和治疗后的超敏反应评分进行评估。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验确定数据的均匀性。采用χ 2显著性检验比较比例。组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:在30 min和1周时,980 nm激光比660 nm激光更有效,但在1、3、6个月时,两组间差异无统计学意义。在整个试验期间,660 nm和980 nm二极管激光器比ACP-CPP剂更有效地降低DH。结论:660 nm二极管激光器、980 nm二极管激光器和ACP-CPP药物作为有效的脱敏剂在临床应用时具有积极的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信