Efficacy of colistin-based combinations against pandrug-resistant whole-genome-sequenced Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from hospitalized patients in Egypt: an in vitro/vivo comparative study.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Eriny T Attalla, Amal M Khalil, Azza S Zakaria, Rhiannon Evans, Nesrin S Tolba, Nelly M Mohamed
{"title":"Efficacy of colistin-based combinations against pandrug-resistant whole-genome-sequenced Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from hospitalized patients in Egypt: an in vitro/vivo comparative study.","authors":"Eriny T Attalla, Amal M Khalil, Azza S Zakaria, Rhiannon Evans, Nesrin S Tolba, Nelly M Mohamed","doi":"10.1186/s13099-024-00667-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colistin resistance significantly constrains available treatment options and results in the emergence of pandrug-resistant (PDR) strains. Treating PDR infections is a major public health issue. A promising solution lies in using colistin-based combinations. Despite the availability of in vitro data evaluating these combinations, the in vivo studies remain limited.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (ColRKp) isolates were collected from hospitalized patients. Colistin resistance was detected using broth microdilution, and antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the Kirby-Bauer method against 18 antibiotics. Extremely high resistance levels were detected, with 17% of the isolates being PDR. Virulence profiling, assessed using Anthony capsule staining, the string test, and the crystal violet assay, indicated the predominance of non-biofilm formers and non-hypermucoid strains. The isolates were screened for mcr genes using polymerase chain reaction. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and bioinformatics analysis were performed to characterize the genomes of PDR isolates. No plasmid-borne mcr genes were detected, and WGS analysis revealed that PDR isolates belonged to the high-risk clones: ST14 (n = 1), ST147 (n = 2), and ST383 (n = 2). They carried genes encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases, bla<sub>CTX-M-15</sub> and bla<sub>NDM-5</sub>, on conjugative IncHI1B/IncFIB plasmids, illustrating the convergence of virulence and resistance genes. The most common mechanism of colistin resistance involved alterations in mgrB. Furthermore, deleterious amino acid substitutions were also detected within PhoQ, PmrC, CrrB, ArnB, and ArnT. Seven colistin-containing combinations were compared using the checkerboard experiment. Synergy was observed when combining colistin with tigecycline, doxycycline, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, imipenem, or meropenem. The efficacy of colistin combined with either doxycycline or levofloxacin was assessed in vitro using a resistance modulation assay, and in vivo, using a murine infection model. In vitro, doxycycline and levofloxacin reversed colistin resistance in 80% and 73.3% of the population, respectively. In vivo, the colistin + doxycycline combination demonstrated superiority over colistin + levofloxacin, rescuing 80% of infected animals, and reducing bacterial bioburden in the liver and kidneys while preserving nearly intact lung histology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents the first comparative in vitro and in vivo investigation of the efficacy of colistin + doxycycline and colistin + levofloxacin combinations in clinical PDR ColRKp isolates characterized at a genomic level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12833,"journal":{"name":"Gut Pathogens","volume":"16 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-024-00667-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colistin resistance significantly constrains available treatment options and results in the emergence of pandrug-resistant (PDR) strains. Treating PDR infections is a major public health issue. A promising solution lies in using colistin-based combinations. Despite the availability of in vitro data evaluating these combinations, the in vivo studies remain limited.

Results: Thirty colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (ColRKp) isolates were collected from hospitalized patients. Colistin resistance was detected using broth microdilution, and antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the Kirby-Bauer method against 18 antibiotics. Extremely high resistance levels were detected, with 17% of the isolates being PDR. Virulence profiling, assessed using Anthony capsule staining, the string test, and the crystal violet assay, indicated the predominance of non-biofilm formers and non-hypermucoid strains. The isolates were screened for mcr genes using polymerase chain reaction. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and bioinformatics analysis were performed to characterize the genomes of PDR isolates. No plasmid-borne mcr genes were detected, and WGS analysis revealed that PDR isolates belonged to the high-risk clones: ST14 (n = 1), ST147 (n = 2), and ST383 (n = 2). They carried genes encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases, blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM-5, on conjugative IncHI1B/IncFIB plasmids, illustrating the convergence of virulence and resistance genes. The most common mechanism of colistin resistance involved alterations in mgrB. Furthermore, deleterious amino acid substitutions were also detected within PhoQ, PmrC, CrrB, ArnB, and ArnT. Seven colistin-containing combinations were compared using the checkerboard experiment. Synergy was observed when combining colistin with tigecycline, doxycycline, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, imipenem, or meropenem. The efficacy of colistin combined with either doxycycline or levofloxacin was assessed in vitro using a resistance modulation assay, and in vivo, using a murine infection model. In vitro, doxycycline and levofloxacin reversed colistin resistance in 80% and 73.3% of the population, respectively. In vivo, the colistin + doxycycline combination demonstrated superiority over colistin + levofloxacin, rescuing 80% of infected animals, and reducing bacterial bioburden in the liver and kidneys while preserving nearly intact lung histology.

Conclusions: This study represents the first comparative in vitro and in vivo investigation of the efficacy of colistin + doxycycline and colistin + levofloxacin combinations in clinical PDR ColRKp isolates characterized at a genomic level.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gut Pathogens
Gut Pathogens GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Gut Pathogens is a fast publishing, inclusive and prominent international journal which recognizes the need for a publishing platform uniquely tailored to reflect the full breadth of research in the biology and medicine of pathogens, commensals and functional microbiota of the gut. The journal publishes basic, clinical and cutting-edge research on all aspects of the above mentioned organisms including probiotic bacteria and yeasts and their products. The scope also covers the related ecology, molecular genetics, physiology and epidemiology of these microbes. The journal actively invites timely reports on the novel aspects of genomics, metagenomics, microbiota profiling and systems biology. Gut Pathogens will also consider, at the discretion of the editors, descriptive studies identifying a new genome sequence of a gut microbe or a series of related microbes (such as those obtained from new hosts, niches, settings, outbreaks and epidemics) and those obtained from single or multiple hosts at one or different time points (chronological evolution).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信