Application of MSCT Image Post-Processing Techniques in the Identification of Rib Fracture Malunion.

Q3 Medicine
Jing-Chen Ge, Min Shang, Ming-Yang Yao, Ming-Fei Wei, Jun-Zhan Shi, Ze-Wei Yao, Jia-Yin Shi, Fan Li
{"title":"Application of MSCT Image Post-Processing Techniques in the Identification of Rib Fracture Malunion.","authors":"Jing-Chen Ge, Min Shang, Ming-Yang Yao, Ming-Fei Wei, Jun-Zhan Shi, Ze-Wei Yao, Jia-Yin Shi, Fan Li","doi":"10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2023.230707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the application value of three image post-processing techniques volume rendering (VR), multiplanar reformation (MPR) and curved planar reformation (CPR) in the identification of rib fracture malunion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The types and numbers of rib fracture malunion in 75 patients were recorded, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and Youden index of VR, MPR and CPR in the diagnosis of rib fracture malunion were compared. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, and the detection rates of three image post-processing techniques for different types of rib fracture malunion were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 243 rib fractures were malunion in 75 patients. The diagnostic sensitivity of VR, MPR and CPR for rib fracture malunion was 52.67%, 79.84% and 91.36%, the specificity was 99.58%, 97.89% and 99.15%, the accuracy was 83.66%, 91.76% and 96.51%, the Youden index was 0.52, 0.78 and 0.91, the AUC was 0.761, 0.889 and 0.953, respectively. Compared with VR, there were statistically significant differences in the number of broken rib end misalignment over 1/3, broken rib end overlap, broken rib end angulation and intercostal bridge detected in MPR (<i>P</i><0.05). Compared with VR, there was a statistically significant difference in the number of different types of rib fracture malunion detected by CPR (<i>P</i><0.05). Compared with MPR, there were statistically significant differences in the number of broken rib end misalignment over 1/3, broken rib end separation and intercostal bridge detected in CPR (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three image post-processing techniques are of great significance for the identification of rib fracture malunion. Especially CPR is highly effective in the diagnosis of rib fracture malunion, and can be used as the main post-processing technique for forensic clinical identification of rib fracture malunion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12317,"journal":{"name":"法医学杂志","volume":"40 4","pages":"324-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"法医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2023.230707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the application value of three image post-processing techniques volume rendering (VR), multiplanar reformation (MPR) and curved planar reformation (CPR) in the identification of rib fracture malunion.

Methods: The types and numbers of rib fracture malunion in 75 patients were recorded, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and Youden index of VR, MPR and CPR in the diagnosis of rib fracture malunion were compared. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, and the detection rates of three image post-processing techniques for different types of rib fracture malunion were compared.

Results: A total of 243 rib fractures were malunion in 75 patients. The diagnostic sensitivity of VR, MPR and CPR for rib fracture malunion was 52.67%, 79.84% and 91.36%, the specificity was 99.58%, 97.89% and 99.15%, the accuracy was 83.66%, 91.76% and 96.51%, the Youden index was 0.52, 0.78 and 0.91, the AUC was 0.761, 0.889 and 0.953, respectively. Compared with VR, there were statistically significant differences in the number of broken rib end misalignment over 1/3, broken rib end overlap, broken rib end angulation and intercostal bridge detected in MPR (P<0.05). Compared with VR, there was a statistically significant difference in the number of different types of rib fracture malunion detected by CPR (P<0.05). Compared with MPR, there were statistically significant differences in the number of broken rib end misalignment over 1/3, broken rib end separation and intercostal bridge detected in CPR (P<0.05).

Conclusions: The three image post-processing techniques are of great significance for the identification of rib fracture malunion. Especially CPR is highly effective in the diagnosis of rib fracture malunion, and can be used as the main post-processing technique for forensic clinical identification of rib fracture malunion.

MSCT图像后处理技术在肋骨骨折畸形愈合识别中的应用。
目的:比较体绘制(VR)、多平面重构(MPR)和曲面重构(CPR)三种图像后处理技术在肋骨骨折不愈合识别中的应用价值。方法:记录75例患者肋骨骨折不愈合的类型和数量,比较VR、MPR和CPR诊断肋骨骨折不愈合的敏感性、特异性、准确性及约登指数。绘制接收算子特征曲线(Receiver operator characteristic, ROC)并计算曲线下面积(area under curve, AUC),比较三种图像后处理技术对不同类型肋骨骨折不愈合的检出率。结果:75例患者共243例肋骨骨折不愈合。VR、MPR和CPR对肋骨骨折不愈合的诊断敏感性分别为52.67%、79.84%和91.36%,特异性分别为99.58%、97.89%和99.15%,准确率分别为83.66%、91.76%和96.51%,约登指数分别为0.52、0.78和0.91,AUC分别为0.761、0.889和0.953。与VR相比,MPR (ppr)检测到的断肋端错位超过1/3、断肋端重叠、断肋端成角、肋间桥的数量差异有统计学意义。结论:三种图像后处理技术对识别肋骨骨折不愈合具有重要意义。特别是心肺复苏术对肋骨骨折不愈合的诊断效果非常好,可以作为肋骨骨折不愈合法医临床鉴定的主要后处理技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
法医学杂志
法医学杂志 Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信