Causal association of serum vitamin D levels with urolithiasis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Qi-Feng Zhang, He-Zhen Zhang, Sheng Wang, Li-Yuan Zeng
{"title":"Causal association of serum vitamin D levels with urolithiasis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Qi-Feng Zhang, He-Zhen Zhang, Sheng Wang, Li-Yuan Zeng","doi":"10.1007/s00394-024-03553-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In light of inconsistent evidence from previous observational studies regarding the correlation between serum vitamin D levels and urolithiasis, this study aimed to investigate the genome-wide causal association between genetically predicted serum 25(OH)D levels and urolithiasis using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we utilized genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics from the UK Biobank and SUNLIGHT consortium for serum vitamin D levels, as well as urolithiasis data from FinnGen. We employed bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to evaluate potential causal relationships. The primary MR analysis relied on the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode approaches. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure result robustness, including Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, leave-one-out tests, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MR analysis indicated no significant causal effects of serum 25(OH)D levels on urolithiasis [IVW method: (kidney and ureteral stones: OR = 1.134;95% CI, 0.953 to 1.350, p = 0.155; lower urinary tract stones: OR = 1.158; 95% CI, 0.806 to 1.666, p = 0.428)]. However, according to the IVW results, genetically predicted kidney and ureteral stones were associated with decreased serum 25(OH)D levels (beta = -0.025; 95% CI, -0.048 to -0.003; p = 0.028), while they did not indicate a causal effect of lower urinary tract stones on serum 25(OH)D levels (beta = -0.002; 95% CI, -0.013 to -0.008; p = 0.662). A sensitivity analysis suggested the robustness of these causal associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our MR study did not provide evidence supporting a causal association between serum 25(OH)D levels and urolithiasis among individuals of European descent. However, there might exist a negative causal association between kidney and ureteral stones and serum 25(OH)D levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":"64 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03553-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In light of inconsistent evidence from previous observational studies regarding the correlation between serum vitamin D levels and urolithiasis, this study aimed to investigate the genome-wide causal association between genetically predicted serum 25(OH)D levels and urolithiasis using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

Methods: In this study, we utilized genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics from the UK Biobank and SUNLIGHT consortium for serum vitamin D levels, as well as urolithiasis data from FinnGen. We employed bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to evaluate potential causal relationships. The primary MR analysis relied on the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode approaches. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure result robustness, including Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, leave-one-out tests, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test.

Results: The MR analysis indicated no significant causal effects of serum 25(OH)D levels on urolithiasis [IVW method: (kidney and ureteral stones: OR = 1.134;95% CI, 0.953 to 1.350, p = 0.155; lower urinary tract stones: OR = 1.158; 95% CI, 0.806 to 1.666, p = 0.428)]. However, according to the IVW results, genetically predicted kidney and ureteral stones were associated with decreased serum 25(OH)D levels (beta = -0.025; 95% CI, -0.048 to -0.003; p = 0.028), while they did not indicate a causal effect of lower urinary tract stones on serum 25(OH)D levels (beta = -0.002; 95% CI, -0.013 to -0.008; p = 0.662). A sensitivity analysis suggested the robustness of these causal associations.

Conclusions: Our MR study did not provide evidence supporting a causal association between serum 25(OH)D levels and urolithiasis among individuals of European descent. However, there might exist a negative causal association between kidney and ureteral stones and serum 25(OH)D levels.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on immunology and inflammation, gene expression, metabolism, chronic diseases, or carcinogenesis, or a major focus on epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients, biofunctionality of food and food components, or the impact of diet on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信