Failed mobility transition in an ideal setting and implications for building a green city

Mareike Andert, Melanie Nagel
{"title":"Failed mobility transition in an ideal setting and implications for building a green city","authors":"Mareike Andert, Melanie Nagel","doi":"10.1038/s44168-024-00189-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mobility sector significantly contributes to the climate crisis, impacting several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) such as good health (SDG 3), sustainable cities (SDG 11), climate action (SDG 13), and life on land (SDG 15). Despite broad consensus on the need for mobility transformation, practical implementation is contentious due to diverse stakeholder interests. Tübingen, a green showcase city in Germany, exemplifies this challenge. Although ideal for green mobility, a tramway project was rejected in a referendum. This case-study highlights that mobility transition is not just a technical issue but a discourse-communicative challenge, emphasising the role of socially embedded narratives. The study aims to explain the referendum’s rejection by analysing discourses, identifying argumentation patterns, and providing insights for future projects. Using Hajer’s Discourse Coalitions approach and Discourse Network Analysis, the study found that the discourse was dynamic and polarised. The pro-tramway coalition’s communication deficiencies and the opposing coalition’s strong narrative connectivity influenced the outcome. Recommendations for effective communication strategies in future projects are provided.","PeriodicalId":186004,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate Action","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00189-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00189-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mobility sector significantly contributes to the climate crisis, impacting several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) such as good health (SDG 3), sustainable cities (SDG 11), climate action (SDG 13), and life on land (SDG 15). Despite broad consensus on the need for mobility transformation, practical implementation is contentious due to diverse stakeholder interests. Tübingen, a green showcase city in Germany, exemplifies this challenge. Although ideal for green mobility, a tramway project was rejected in a referendum. This case-study highlights that mobility transition is not just a technical issue but a discourse-communicative challenge, emphasising the role of socially embedded narratives. The study aims to explain the referendum’s rejection by analysing discourses, identifying argumentation patterns, and providing insights for future projects. Using Hajer’s Discourse Coalitions approach and Discourse Network Analysis, the study found that the discourse was dynamic and polarised. The pro-tramway coalition’s communication deficiencies and the opposing coalition’s strong narrative connectivity influenced the outcome. Recommendations for effective communication strategies in future projects are provided.

Abstract Image

理想环境下的交通转型失败及其对绿色城市建设的启示
交通部门严重加剧了气候危机,影响了若干可持续发展目标(SDG),如良好健康(SDG 3)、可持续城市(SDG 11)、气候行动(SDG 13)和陆地生命(SDG 15)。尽管人们对交通转型的必要性达成了广泛共识,但由于利益相关者的利益不同,实际实施存在争议。德国绿色示范城市宾根就是这一挑战的典范。尽管有轨电车项目是绿色交通的理想选择,但在全民公决中被否决。这个案例研究强调了流动性的转变不仅仅是一个技术问题,而且是一个话语交际的挑战,强调了社会嵌入叙事的作用。该研究旨在通过分析话语、识别论证模式和为未来项目提供见解来解释公投的拒绝。运用Hajer的话语联盟方法和话语网络分析发现,语篇是动态的、两极化的。支持有轨电车联盟的沟通缺陷和反对联盟强烈的叙事连通性影响了结果。对今后项目的有效沟通策略提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信