Psychosocial risks faced by olive workers in Spain: evaluated using the 'Mini Psychosocial Factors' questionnaire.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
María Olivencia-Manzano, Marta Gómez-Galán, Manuel Díaz-Pérez, Angel Jesus Callejon-Ferre
{"title":"Psychosocial risks faced by olive workers in Spain: evaluated using the 'Mini Psychosocial Factors' questionnaire.","authors":"María Olivencia-Manzano, Marta Gómez-Galán, Manuel Díaz-Pérez, Angel Jesus Callejon-Ferre","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spain has the largest olive-growing area in Europe. The goal of the present research is to evaluate the psychosocial risks faced by workers in the olive groves of Jaén (the largest olive grove region of Spain).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This method consists of 15 questions that analyse a total of 12 variables (mental load, demands, health, etc). A total of 502 questionnaires were completed. The method was performed using a non-stratified (with respect to the location of the growing areas) random selection with 'Universal Transverse Mercator' coordinates on a map of Jaen extracted from Andalusia region mapping. Multiple correspondence analysis, the Burt table and descriptive statistics (with a χ<sup>2</sup> test) have been used to analyse the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses of all the workers are identified in detail in the Burt table. Olive grove workers, regardless of their characteristics or the type of farm, are at a medium risk level for the different psychosocial factors (around 57% on average). The low-risk level is the next most common (around 36% on average). On average, only 7% of individuals are found at the high-risk level (only intensive olive groves exceed 10% of individuals at this risk level). Using multiple correspondence analysis, a video has been created to demonstrate the relationship between all the categories of all the variables studied from various perspectives in three dimensions. The first dimension captures mainly aspects of the social working environment (relation, recognition, support, compensation, control, mental load), whereas the second dimension captures mainly work demands (rhythm, demands). The third dimension is more about physical status (weight, body mass index).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risks found will improve injury prevention and are possibly caused by mismanagement of prevention. The extreme drought conditions of the 2022/2023 agricultural season could have affected the demands faced by workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spain has the largest olive-growing area in Europe. The goal of the present research is to evaluate the psychosocial risks faced by workers in the olive groves of Jaén (the largest olive grove region of Spain).

Method: This method consists of 15 questions that analyse a total of 12 variables (mental load, demands, health, etc). A total of 502 questionnaires were completed. The method was performed using a non-stratified (with respect to the location of the growing areas) random selection with 'Universal Transverse Mercator' coordinates on a map of Jaen extracted from Andalusia region mapping. Multiple correspondence analysis, the Burt table and descriptive statistics (with a χ2 test) have been used to analyse the results.

Results: The responses of all the workers are identified in detail in the Burt table. Olive grove workers, regardless of their characteristics or the type of farm, are at a medium risk level for the different psychosocial factors (around 57% on average). The low-risk level is the next most common (around 36% on average). On average, only 7% of individuals are found at the high-risk level (only intensive olive groves exceed 10% of individuals at this risk level). Using multiple correspondence analysis, a video has been created to demonstrate the relationship between all the categories of all the variables studied from various perspectives in three dimensions. The first dimension captures mainly aspects of the social working environment (relation, recognition, support, compensation, control, mental load), whereas the second dimension captures mainly work demands (rhythm, demands). The third dimension is more about physical status (weight, body mass index).

Conclusion: The risks found will improve injury prevention and are possibly caused by mismanagement of prevention. The extreme drought conditions of the 2022/2023 agricultural season could have affected the demands faced by workers.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信