Esophageal ESD Training; Perspective of West vs. East.

Q1 Medicine
Current Gastroenterology Reports Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1007/s11894-024-00951-7
Abdulrahman Qatomah, Hiroyuki Aihara
{"title":"Esophageal ESD Training; Perspective of West vs. East.","authors":"Abdulrahman Qatomah, Hiroyuki Aihara","doi":"10.1007/s11894-024-00951-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and carries a poor prognosis. While esophagectomy poses considerable mortality and morbidity risks, endoscopic resection can provide a safer and less invasive alternative. RECENT FINDINGS: Endoscopic resection therapy has allowed a less invasive approach with comparable outcomes to esophagectomy. EMR is considered safe and requires less intensive training, yet it does not offer complete histopathological assessment due to the nature of piecemeal resection for larger lesions. Alternatively, ESD offers an R0 resection, therefore allowing precise histopathological evaluation. Training in ESD is essential; however, a uniform training model has not been agreed upon. The Japanese apprenticeship training model has proven effective, with promising training outcomes from the Eastern experience. In the West, a comprehensive training model through a combination of apprenticeship with progressive exposure, including ex-vivo and live animal hands-on training, could be the optimal approach. Different methods of ESD training are currently available, all of which aim to provide the experience needed to perform safe ESD. Despite the differences in training styles between the East and the West, a modified apprenticeship model could potentially result in more effective and better training outcomes. The currently available technologies provide the environment to enhance ESD training.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-024-00951-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and carries a poor prognosis. While esophagectomy poses considerable mortality and morbidity risks, endoscopic resection can provide a safer and less invasive alternative. RECENT FINDINGS: Endoscopic resection therapy has allowed a less invasive approach with comparable outcomes to esophagectomy. EMR is considered safe and requires less intensive training, yet it does not offer complete histopathological assessment due to the nature of piecemeal resection for larger lesions. Alternatively, ESD offers an R0 resection, therefore allowing precise histopathological evaluation. Training in ESD is essential; however, a uniform training model has not been agreed upon. The Japanese apprenticeship training model has proven effective, with promising training outcomes from the Eastern experience. In the West, a comprehensive training model through a combination of apprenticeship with progressive exposure, including ex-vivo and live animal hands-on training, could be the optimal approach. Different methods of ESD training are currently available, all of which aim to provide the experience needed to perform safe ESD. Despite the differences in training styles between the East and the West, a modified apprenticeship model could potentially result in more effective and better training outcomes. The currently available technologies provide the environment to enhance ESD training.

食管ESD训练;西方vs.东方的视角。
回顾目的:食管癌是世界上最常见的癌症之一,预后较差。虽然食管切除术有相当大的死亡率和发病率风险,但内镜切除可以提供一种更安全、侵入性更小的选择。最近的发现:内镜切除治疗是一种侵入性较小的方法,其结果与食管切除术相当。EMR被认为是安全的,需要较少的强化训练,但由于对较大病变进行分段切除的性质,它不能提供完整的组织病理学评估。另外,ESD提供R0切除,因此可以进行精确的组织病理学评估。可持续发展教育方面的培训至关重要;然而,统一的培训模式尚未达成一致意见。日本的学徒培训模式已被证明是有效的,东方经验的培训成果也很有希望。在西方,一种综合的培训模式,结合学徒制和渐进式的接触,包括离体和活体动物的动手训练,可能是最佳的方法。目前有不同的ESD培训方法,目的都是提供执行安全ESD所需的经验。尽管东西方之间的培训风格存在差异,但改进的学徒模式可能会产生更有效和更好的培训结果。现有的技术为加强ESD培训提供了环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Gastroenterology Reports
Current Gastroenterology Reports Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: As the field of gastroenterology and hepatology rapidly evolves, the wealth of published literature can be overwhelming. The aim of the journal is to help readers stay abreast of such advances by offering authoritative, systematic reviews by leading experts. We accomplish this aim by appointing Section Editors who invite international experts to contribute review articles that highlight recent developments and important papers published in the past year. Major topics in gastroenterology are covered, including pediatric gastroenterology, neuromuscular disorders, infections, nutrition, and inflammatory bowel disease. These reviews provide clear, insightful summaries of expert perspectives relevant to clinical practice. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信