Mild Asthma- What Matters to Patients and Parents.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Emma Greimann, George E Freigeh, Rachel P Wettenstein, Belinda Nelson, Laurie M Carpenter, Arjun Mohan, Alan Baptist
{"title":"Mild Asthma- What Matters to Patients and Parents.","authors":"Emma Greimann, George E Freigeh, Rachel P Wettenstein, Belinda Nelson, Laurie M Carpenter, Arjun Mohan, Alan Baptist","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild asthma has received less attention despite accounting for the majority of asthma patients. However, asthma complications including hospitalizations and progressive loss of lung function frequently occur in such patients. The priorities of mild asthma patients are unknown, hindering the ability to advance care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify patient and parent perspectives on the definition of mild asthma, treatment preferences, concerns and goals of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with self-defined mild/intermittent asthma were recruited using emails distributed through the Allergy & Asthma Network (AAN) and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA). A demographic survey and measures of asthma control/quality of life were completed. Focus groups consisting of approximately 5 participants and a focus group leader were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients and 20 parents of children with mild asthma participated. Focus groups revealed significant variability in the definition and treatment preferences. Frequency of symptoms appears to be a key driver in treatment decisions for mild asthma, and those with infrequent symptoms were opposed to the addition of an inhaled corticosteroid to albuterol. Use of recommended asthma monitoring strategies such as asthma action plans or peak flow meters was low among adults. Participants desired more education from their providers regarding asthma remission and long-term complications associated with mild asthma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is significant heterogeneity in the definition and treatment preferences among patients and parents of those with mild asthma. Shared decision making between patients and providers is necessary to personalize medical decisions in those with mild asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2024.11.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mild asthma has received less attention despite accounting for the majority of asthma patients. However, asthma complications including hospitalizations and progressive loss of lung function frequently occur in such patients. The priorities of mild asthma patients are unknown, hindering the ability to advance care.

Objective: To identify patient and parent perspectives on the definition of mild asthma, treatment preferences, concerns and goals of care.

Methods: Participants with self-defined mild/intermittent asthma were recruited using emails distributed through the Allergy & Asthma Network (AAN) and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA). A demographic survey and measures of asthma control/quality of life were completed. Focus groups consisting of approximately 5 participants and a focus group leader were conducted.

Results: A total of 20 patients and 20 parents of children with mild asthma participated. Focus groups revealed significant variability in the definition and treatment preferences. Frequency of symptoms appears to be a key driver in treatment decisions for mild asthma, and those with infrequent symptoms were opposed to the addition of an inhaled corticosteroid to albuterol. Use of recommended asthma monitoring strategies such as asthma action plans or peak flow meters was low among adults. Participants desired more education from their providers regarding asthma remission and long-term complications associated with mild asthma.

Conclusion: There is significant heterogeneity in the definition and treatment preferences among patients and parents of those with mild asthma. Shared decision making between patients and providers is necessary to personalize medical decisions in those with mild asthma.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信