Effects of Nutritional Protocol Changes on Hemodialysis Adequacy and Patient Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Cebrail Karaca, Safak Mirioglu, Aydan Mutis Alan, Saadet Usakli, Beyza Nur Aydin Keskin, Mehmet Erdem, Ahmet Murt, Mevlut Tamer Dincer, Nurhan Seyahi, Sinan Trabulus
{"title":"Effects of Nutritional Protocol Changes on Hemodialysis Adequacy and Patient Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Cebrail Karaca, Safak Mirioglu, Aydan Mutis Alan, Saadet Usakli, Beyza Nur Aydin Keskin, Mehmet Erdem, Ahmet Murt, Mevlut Tamer Dincer, Nurhan Seyahi, Sinan Trabulus","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, strict feeding restrictions were implemented in many dialysis centers to minimize transmission between patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of these feeding restrictions on dry weight, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective single-center study involving 76 hemodialysis patients, data from 2 consecutive 6-month periods were analyzed: the first before the COVID-19 pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was supported, and the second during the pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was restricted. Data from the patients' monthly visits during both periods were evaluated, averages were recorded, and a comparison was made between the 2 periods. RESULTS The frequency of IDH was significantly higher during the feeding period compared with the no-feeding period (1.4±1.2/month vs 0.81±0.86/month, P=0.01). Conversely, the urea reduction ratio was greater in the no-feeding period [72.5% (69-76) vs 71% (68-75), P=0.01], as were the single-pool Kt/V values (1.59±0.23 vs 1.52±0.26, P=0.004) and ultrafiltration rates (mL/h/kg) (11.4±3.0 vs 10.4±3.2, P=0.01). However, the dry weight of the patients was similar in the 2 periods (65.4±13.7 kg vs 65.7±14.2 kg, P=0.62). CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, mandatory feeding restrictions for hemodialysis patients, aimed at reducing transmission, were linked to a decrease in IDH frequency and improved dialysis adequacy. However, no significant reduction in patients' dry weights was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e946471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, strict feeding restrictions were implemented in many dialysis centers to minimize transmission between patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of these feeding restrictions on dry weight, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective single-center study involving 76 hemodialysis patients, data from 2 consecutive 6-month periods were analyzed: the first before the COVID-19 pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was supported, and the second during the pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was restricted. Data from the patients' monthly visits during both periods were evaluated, averages were recorded, and a comparison was made between the 2 periods. RESULTS The frequency of IDH was significantly higher during the feeding period compared with the no-feeding period (1.4±1.2/month vs 0.81±0.86/month, P=0.01). Conversely, the urea reduction ratio was greater in the no-feeding period [72.5% (69-76) vs 71% (68-75), P=0.01], as were the single-pool Kt/V values (1.59±0.23 vs 1.52±0.26, P=0.004) and ultrafiltration rates (mL/h/kg) (11.4±3.0 vs 10.4±3.2, P=0.01). However, the dry weight of the patients was similar in the 2 periods (65.4±13.7 kg vs 65.7±14.2 kg, P=0.62). CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, mandatory feeding restrictions for hemodialysis patients, aimed at reducing transmission, were linked to a decrease in IDH frequency and improved dialysis adequacy. However, no significant reduction in patients' dry weights was observed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信