An application of the Checklist for Health Economic Quality Evaluations (CHEQUE) in a systematic review setting.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Stijntje W Dijk, Skander Essafi, Myriam G M Hunink
{"title":"An application of the Checklist for Health Economic Quality Evaluations (CHEQUE) in a systematic review setting.","authors":"Stijntje W Dijk, Skander Essafi, Myriam G M Hunink","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.10.3853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality assessment tools serve an important role in evaluating economic evaluations. This paper showcases the first application of the Checklist for Health Economic Quality Evaluations (CHEQUE) tool in a systematic review setting and offers descriptive reflections on its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied CHEQUE to 21 diverse economic evaluations in a systematic review on medical education. We visualize weighted CHEQUE scores, calculate correlations between methods- and reporting sections, and provide all data and R code for re-use in future applications. Finally, we provide a detailed overview of our judgements and alternative considerations of the checklist items, and suggestions for further development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scores ranged from 18% to 94% depending on the applied weighting method, with a positive correlation between method and reporting quality. CHEQUE enables systematic and standardized assessment but may benefit from refinement in scoring clarity and burden reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study provides insights for future guidance on applying and developing CHEQUE or similar tools in economic evaluation quality assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.10.3853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Quality assessment tools serve an important role in evaluating economic evaluations. This paper showcases the first application of the Checklist for Health Economic Quality Evaluations (CHEQUE) tool in a systematic review setting and offers descriptive reflections on its use.

Methods: We applied CHEQUE to 21 diverse economic evaluations in a systematic review on medical education. We visualize weighted CHEQUE scores, calculate correlations between methods- and reporting sections, and provide all data and R code for re-use in future applications. Finally, we provide a detailed overview of our judgements and alternative considerations of the checklist items, and suggestions for further development.

Results: Scores ranged from 18% to 94% depending on the applied weighting method, with a positive correlation between method and reporting quality. CHEQUE enables systematic and standardized assessment but may benefit from refinement in scoring clarity and burden reduction.

Conclusion: Our study provides insights for future guidance on applying and developing CHEQUE or similar tools in economic evaluation quality assessment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信