A novel virtual reality fear conditioning paradigm to investigate the influence of expectancy violation on fear extinction

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Daniel Gromer, Yannik Stegmann, Bianca Lorenz, Yannik Kraus, Paula Franz, Matthias Gamer
{"title":"A novel virtual reality fear conditioning paradigm to investigate the influence of expectancy violation on fear extinction","authors":"Daniel Gromer,&nbsp;Yannik Stegmann,&nbsp;Bianca Lorenz,&nbsp;Yannik Kraus,&nbsp;Paula Franz,&nbsp;Matthias Gamer","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exposure therapy is an efficient treatment for pathological anxiety, yet its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Prediction error models suggest that optimizing the violation of threat-related expectancies improves treatment outcomes, however, causal evidence is still sparse. The aim of the current study was therefore to provide causal evidence for the influence of the extent of expectancy violations on extinction retention using a novel virtual reality fear conditioning paradigm. In total, 100 participants completed a two-day fear conditioning paradigm in which the approach behavior of an animated stimulus was differentially reinforced with an electrical stimulus (i.e., closer distances were associated with a higher probability for receiving the aversive stimulation). To experimentally manipulate the extent of expectancy violations during fear extinction, participants were presented only with distances to the conditioned stimulus that either weakly (i.e., far distances) or strongly predicted the aversive outcome (i.e., close distances), resulting in low vs. high expectancy violations. We found successful fear acquisition and extinction, as well as an influence of the extent of expectancy violations on US-expectancy and threat ratings after extinction on day 1. On the second day, at a spontaneous recovery and reinstatement test, however, there was only weak evidence for improved extinction retention in the high expectancy violation condition. Optimizing expectancy violations might be a necessary but not sufficient condition for improved extinction retention. Future research needs to address the conditions under which expectancy violations lead to robust expectancy adjustments and how these conditions can be met in exposure therapy for anxiety disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"479 ","pages":"Article 115356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432824005126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure therapy is an efficient treatment for pathological anxiety, yet its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Prediction error models suggest that optimizing the violation of threat-related expectancies improves treatment outcomes, however, causal evidence is still sparse. The aim of the current study was therefore to provide causal evidence for the influence of the extent of expectancy violations on extinction retention using a novel virtual reality fear conditioning paradigm. In total, 100 participants completed a two-day fear conditioning paradigm in which the approach behavior of an animated stimulus was differentially reinforced with an electrical stimulus (i.e., closer distances were associated with a higher probability for receiving the aversive stimulation). To experimentally manipulate the extent of expectancy violations during fear extinction, participants were presented only with distances to the conditioned stimulus that either weakly (i.e., far distances) or strongly predicted the aversive outcome (i.e., close distances), resulting in low vs. high expectancy violations. We found successful fear acquisition and extinction, as well as an influence of the extent of expectancy violations on US-expectancy and threat ratings after extinction on day 1. On the second day, at a spontaneous recovery and reinstatement test, however, there was only weak evidence for improved extinction retention in the high expectancy violation condition. Optimizing expectancy violations might be a necessary but not sufficient condition for improved extinction retention. Future research needs to address the conditions under which expectancy violations lead to robust expectancy adjustments and how these conditions can be met in exposure therapy for anxiety disorders.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信