Acceptability of physiotherapists as primary care practitioners for the care of people with musculoskeletal disorders: a French population-based cross-sectional survey

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
A. Demont , R. Vervaeke , S. Lafrance , F. Desmeules , A. Dumas , A. Bourmaud
{"title":"Acceptability of physiotherapists as primary care practitioners for the care of people with musculoskeletal disorders: a French population-based cross-sectional survey","authors":"A. Demont ,&nbsp;R. Vervaeke ,&nbsp;S. Lafrance ,&nbsp;F. Desmeules ,&nbsp;A. Dumas ,&nbsp;A. Bourmaud","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In France, early access to physiotherapy for people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) depends on prescription and referral by the family physician in the physician-led model of care. The readiness of French people for direct access to physiotherapy is not known. This survey aims to identify the perceptions of French adults regarding physiotherapists' competence to diagnose and manage MSKDs if they were primary care practitioners, confidence in their ability to provide quality care, and satisfaction with the last episode of care for those concerned; and to identify factors associated with these three variables.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>French population-based cross-sectional survey.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A representative sample of the French adult population was surveyed between June 2020 and September 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><div>Collected variables included previous physiotherapy experience, perception of competence to diagnose and manage MSKDs as primary care practitioners, confidence about quality of care, and self-referral preferences. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with these three variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1000 participants completed the survey; 854 (85%) believed that physiotherapists would be competent primary care practitioners, and 920 (92%) were confident about the quality of care. Most had previously consulted a physiotherapist (<em>n</em> = 823, 82%); of these, 762 (91%) were satisfied with care received.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This large sample of French adults considered physiotherapists as competent to diagnose and treat some MSKDs as primary care practitioners, and that they provided quality care. Further studies should investigate the scope of care, safety, and efficacy of a direct access physiotherapy model.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Physiotherapists were considered competent as primary care practitioners.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Participants were satisfied with previous physiotherapy received.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Our results support the implementation of direct access physiotherapy in France.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940624004620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

In France, early access to physiotherapy for people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) depends on prescription and referral by the family physician in the physician-led model of care. The readiness of French people for direct access to physiotherapy is not known. This survey aims to identify the perceptions of French adults regarding physiotherapists' competence to diagnose and manage MSKDs if they were primary care practitioners, confidence in their ability to provide quality care, and satisfaction with the last episode of care for those concerned; and to identify factors associated with these three variables.

Design

French population-based cross-sectional survey.

Participants

A representative sample of the French adult population was surveyed between June 2020 and September 2021.

Outcome measures

Collected variables included previous physiotherapy experience, perception of competence to diagnose and manage MSKDs as primary care practitioners, confidence about quality of care, and self-referral preferences. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with these three variables.

Results

A total of 1000 participants completed the survey; 854 (85%) believed that physiotherapists would be competent primary care practitioners, and 920 (92%) were confident about the quality of care. Most had previously consulted a physiotherapist (n = 823, 82%); of these, 762 (91%) were satisfied with care received.

Conclusion

This large sample of French adults considered physiotherapists as competent to diagnose and treat some MSKDs as primary care practitioners, and that they provided quality care. Further studies should investigate the scope of care, safety, and efficacy of a direct access physiotherapy model.

Contribution of Paper

  • Physiotherapists were considered competent as primary care practitioners.
  • Participants were satisfied with previous physiotherapy received.
  • Our results support the implementation of direct access physiotherapy in France.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
377
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy aims to publish original research and facilitate continuing professional development for physiotherapists and other health professions worldwide. Dedicated to the advancement of physiotherapy through publication of research and scholarly work concerned with, but not limited to, its scientific basis and clinical application, education of practitioners, management of services and policy. We are pleased to receive articles reporting original scientific research, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, theoretical or debate articles, brief reports and technical reports. All papers should demonstrate methodological rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信