Improving Diagnostic Yield and Accuracy of Stereotactic Biopsies through Changes in Practice and Techniques: An 8-Year Single-Center Comparative Study.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1789593
Kugan Vijian, Bik Liang Lau, Davendran Kanesen, Swee San Lim, Donald L Ngian, Albert S Hieng Wong
{"title":"Improving Diagnostic Yield and Accuracy of Stereotactic Biopsies through Changes in Practice and Techniques: An 8-Year Single-Center Comparative Study.","authors":"Kugan Vijian, Bik Liang Lau, Davendran Kanesen, Swee San Lim, Donald L Ngian, Albert S Hieng Wong","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1789593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Stereotactic biopsies are used to aid neurosurgeons in clinching the diagnosis of intracranial lesions that are difficult to access surgically. A published study of stereotactic biopsies in our center demonstrated a diagnostic yield of only 76% for biopsies from the year 2014 to 2019. A set of criteria/prerequisites was applied to increase yield. <b>Objective</b>  The aim of the study was to identify the improvement in accuracy and yield after implementation of a set of criteria/prerequisites. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  This was a retrospective and prospective analysis of all patients who underwent stereotactic biopsies from the year 2014 to 2022. This study was conducted at Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia. A set of stereotactic criteria/prerequisites was introduced since 2020, which include preoperative careful, meticulous trajectory planning and target selection, regular checking and maintenance of equipment, larger burr holes, and good sampling techniques. <b>Results</b>  A total of 83 patients underwent stereotactic biopsies from the year 2014 to 2022. Frameless and frame-based methods were used for 45 (54%) and 38 (46%) patients, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield of all biopsies was 84%. Fifty patients underwent stereotactic biopsies prior to implementation of good practice guidelines in 2020 with a positive histopathological yield and accuracy of 76 and 88%, respectively. Thirty-three biopsies done postimplementation demonstrated a yield and accuracy of 97% ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05). There was also a shift of preference toward frame-based methods after 2019, with 85% of these biopsies being frame based. <b>Conclusion</b>  This comparative study shows that adherence to specific stereotactic biopsy guidelines and techniques introduced in our center has successfully improved our biopsy yield and accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"19 4","pages":"701-706"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1789593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Stereotactic biopsies are used to aid neurosurgeons in clinching the diagnosis of intracranial lesions that are difficult to access surgically. A published study of stereotactic biopsies in our center demonstrated a diagnostic yield of only 76% for biopsies from the year 2014 to 2019. A set of criteria/prerequisites was applied to increase yield. Objective  The aim of the study was to identify the improvement in accuracy and yield after implementation of a set of criteria/prerequisites. Materials and Methods  This was a retrospective and prospective analysis of all patients who underwent stereotactic biopsies from the year 2014 to 2022. This study was conducted at Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia. A set of stereotactic criteria/prerequisites was introduced since 2020, which include preoperative careful, meticulous trajectory planning and target selection, regular checking and maintenance of equipment, larger burr holes, and good sampling techniques. Results  A total of 83 patients underwent stereotactic biopsies from the year 2014 to 2022. Frameless and frame-based methods were used for 45 (54%) and 38 (46%) patients, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield of all biopsies was 84%. Fifty patients underwent stereotactic biopsies prior to implementation of good practice guidelines in 2020 with a positive histopathological yield and accuracy of 76 and 88%, respectively. Thirty-three biopsies done postimplementation demonstrated a yield and accuracy of 97% ( p  < 0.05). There was also a shift of preference toward frame-based methods after 2019, with 85% of these biopsies being frame based. Conclusion  This comparative study shows that adherence to specific stereotactic biopsy guidelines and techniques introduced in our center has successfully improved our biopsy yield and accuracy.

通过改变实践和技术提高立体定向活检的诊断率和准确性:一项为期8年的单中心比较研究。
背景 立体定向活检用于帮助神经外科医生确诊手术难以进入的颅内病变。本中心发表的一项立体定向活检研究显示,2014 年至 2019 年期间,活检的诊断率仅为 76%。为了提高诊断率,我们采用了一套标准/前提条件。本研究旨在确定实施一套标准/先决条件后,准确率和诊断率的提高情况。材料和方法 这是一项回顾性和前瞻性分析,分析对象是 2014 年至 2022 年期间接受立体定向活检的所有患者。本研究在马来西亚沙捞越总医院进行。自2020年起,该医院引入了一套立体定向标准/先决条件,包括术前仔细、缜密的轨迹规划和目标选择、设备的定期检查和维护、较大的毛刺孔和良好的取样技术。结果 从2014年到2022年,共有83名患者接受了立体定向活检。采用无框架和有框架方法的患者分别为 45 人(54%)和 38 人(46%)。所有活检的总体诊断率为84%。在2020年实施良好实践指南之前,50名患者接受了立体定向活检,组织病理学阳性率和准确率分别为76%和88%。实施后进行的 33 例活检结果显示,活检率和准确率均为 97% (P 结论 这项比较研究表明,我们中心采用的特定立体定向活检指南和技术成功提高了活检率和准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信