Possible muscle-sparing advantage and bodyweight maintenance of laparoscopic gastrectomy for older patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Masayoshi Terayama, Manabu Ohashi, Motonari Ri, Rie Makuuchi, Masaru Hayami, Satoshi Ida, Koshi Kumagai, Takeshi Sano, Souya Nunobe
{"title":"Possible muscle-sparing advantage and bodyweight maintenance of laparoscopic gastrectomy for older patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.","authors":"Masayoshi Terayama, Manabu Ohashi, Motonari Ri, Rie Makuuchi, Masaru Hayami, Satoshi Ida, Koshi Kumagai, Takeshi Sano, Souya Nunobe","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03554-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is a promising approach for older patients who require less invasive surgery because of their reduced functional reserve and increased comorbidities, with the expansion of its indication to locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the specific benefits of LG in older patients remain unclear. We evaluated whether LG positively influences the postoperative maintenance of skeletal muscle (SM) and bodyweight (BW).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent open gastrectomy (OG) and LG for cStage II or III gastric cancer between 2016 and 2021. After adjustment using propensity score matching, surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared between the groups including the postoperative changes of SM index (%SMI) and BW (%BW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 167 patients who underwent OG (n = 93) and LG (n = 74) were included in the study. After matching, 48 patients in each group were eligible. No significant difference in postoperative complications was observed. Both %SMI and %BW after LG were significantly maintained compared with those after OG during the postoperative first year. LG had consistently positive effects on the maintenance of %SMI and %BW across the prespecified subgroups. Notably, patients with body mass index < 25, performance status 0-1, non-total gastrectomy, and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy benefited from LG in the maintenance of %SMI and %BW.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LG offers greater advantages over OG in maintaining postoperative SM mass as well as BW in patients aged ≥ 75 with locally advanced gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03554-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is a promising approach for older patients who require less invasive surgery because of their reduced functional reserve and increased comorbidities, with the expansion of its indication to locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the specific benefits of LG in older patients remain unclear. We evaluated whether LG positively influences the postoperative maintenance of skeletal muscle (SM) and bodyweight (BW).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent open gastrectomy (OG) and LG for cStage II or III gastric cancer between 2016 and 2021. After adjustment using propensity score matching, surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared between the groups including the postoperative changes of SM index (%SMI) and BW (%BW).

Results: A total of 167 patients who underwent OG (n = 93) and LG (n = 74) were included in the study. After matching, 48 patients in each group were eligible. No significant difference in postoperative complications was observed. Both %SMI and %BW after LG were significantly maintained compared with those after OG during the postoperative first year. LG had consistently positive effects on the maintenance of %SMI and %BW across the prespecified subgroups. Notably, patients with body mass index < 25, performance status 0-1, non-total gastrectomy, and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy benefited from LG in the maintenance of %SMI and %BW.

Conclusion: LG offers greater advantages over OG in maintaining postoperative SM mass as well as BW in patients aged ≥ 75 with locally advanced gastric cancer.

局部晚期胃癌老年患者腹腔镜胃切除术可能具有的肌肉保护优势和体重维持能力。
目的:腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)对于因功能储备下降和合并症增加而需要微创手术的老年患者来说是一种很有前景的方法,其适应症已扩大到局部晚期胃癌。然而,LG 对老年患者的具体益处仍不清楚。我们评估了 LG 是否对术后骨骼肌(SM)和体重(BW)的维持有积极影响:我们回顾性分析了 2016 年至 2021 年间连续接受开胃切除术(OG)和 LG 治疗 c 阶段 II 或 III 胃癌的年龄≥ 75 岁患者的数据。经过倾向评分匹配调整后,比较了两组患者的手术和术后结果,包括术后SM指数(%SMI)和体重(%BW)的变化:共有 167 名患者接受了 OG(93 人)和 LG(74 人)手术。经过配对,每组各有 48 名患者符合条件。术后并发症无明显差异。在术后第一年,LG术后的SMI%和BW%都比OG术后有明显的维持。在预设的亚组中,LG 对维持 SMI 和体重百分比都有持续的积极影响。值得注意的是,体重指数对于年龄≥ 75 岁的局部晚期胃癌患者,LG 在维持术后 SM 质量和体重方面比 OG 更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信