Commentary on Serre et al. : Demonstrating the next era of addiction science

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/add.16720
Bryant M. Stone, Johannes Thrul
{"title":"Commentary on Serre et al. : Demonstrating the next era of addiction science","authors":"Bryant M. Stone,&nbsp;Johannes Thrul","doi":"10.1111/add.16720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Persistent challenges to accurately conceptualizing and effectively treating substance use disorders (SUDs) and behavioral addictions have motivated researchers to adopt increasingly sophisticated methodologies. Among these methods, Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA) [<span>1-4</span>]—real-time data collected in individuals’ daily lives—combined with cutting-edge network analyses, such as multi-level vector autoregression models and group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME) [<span>5-7</span>], offer much potential to improve our understanding of substance use and other addictive behaviors. Serre <i>et al</i>.’s [1] recent study exemplifies how these methods may reshape addiction research by capturing and modeling the dynamic, moment-to-moment fluctuations in key variables (e.g., craving and self-efficacy), producing rich and highly precise information on potential treatment targets. Combining EMA as a data collection design choice with network analyses as an analytical choice, this study highlights the value of conceptualizing addictions as a personalized, fluid process requiring individualized medicine—paving the way for the next frontier of addiction research and treatments. We note two key reasons why this study’s design and analytical choice articulate this combination’s potential and impact [<span>8</span>].</p><p><b>Bryant M. Stone:</b> Conceptualization (equal); writing—original draft (lead); writing-review &amp; editing (equal). <b>Johannes Thrul:</b> Conceptualization (equal); writing-review &amp; editing (equal).</p><p>All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"120 1","pages":"59-60"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16720","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16720","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persistent challenges to accurately conceptualizing and effectively treating substance use disorders (SUDs) and behavioral addictions have motivated researchers to adopt increasingly sophisticated methodologies. Among these methods, Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA) [1-4]—real-time data collected in individuals’ daily lives—combined with cutting-edge network analyses, such as multi-level vector autoregression models and group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME) [5-7], offer much potential to improve our understanding of substance use and other addictive behaviors. Serre et al.’s [1] recent study exemplifies how these methods may reshape addiction research by capturing and modeling the dynamic, moment-to-moment fluctuations in key variables (e.g., craving and self-efficacy), producing rich and highly precise information on potential treatment targets. Combining EMA as a data collection design choice with network analyses as an analytical choice, this study highlights the value of conceptualizing addictions as a personalized, fluid process requiring individualized medicine—paving the way for the next frontier of addiction research and treatments. We note two key reasons why this study’s design and analytical choice articulate this combination’s potential and impact [8].

Bryant M. Stone: Conceptualization (equal); writing—original draft (lead); writing-review & editing (equal). Johannes Thrul: Conceptualization (equal); writing-review & editing (equal).

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

对 Serre 等人的评论:展示成瘾科学的下一个时代。
准确地概念化和有效地治疗物质使用障碍(sud)和行为成瘾的持续挑战促使研究人员采用越来越复杂的方法。在这些方法中,生态瞬间评估(EMA)[1-4]——个人日常生活中收集的实时数据——与前沿的网络分析相结合,如多层次向量自回归模型和群体迭代多模型估计(GIMME)[5-7],为提高我们对物质使用和其他成瘾行为的理解提供了很大的潜力。Serre等人最近的研究举例说明了这些方法如何通过捕捉和模拟关键变量(例如,渴望和自我效能)的动态、即时波动来重塑成瘾研究,从而产生关于潜在治疗目标的丰富和高度精确的信息。将EMA作为数据收集设计选择与网络分析作为分析选择相结合,本研究强调了将成瘾概念化为个性化,流体过程需要个性化药物的价值-为成瘾研究和治疗的下一个前沿铺平了道路。我们注意到两个关键原因,为什么本研究的设计和分析选择阐明了这种组合的潜力和影响bbb。Bryant M. Stone:概念化(平等);写作——原稿(主笔);writing-review,编辑(平等)。约翰内斯·特罗尔:概念化(平等);writing-review,编辑(平等)。所有作者证明,他们没有隶属关系或参与任何组织或实体与任何财务或非经济利益的主题或材料在这篇文章中讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信