Continuous Incisional Infusion of Local Anaesthetic (CIILA) Reduces Postoperative Opioid Usage in Children.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Natalie Vallant, Eleftheria Xilas, Manasvi Upadhyaya
{"title":"Continuous Incisional Infusion of Local Anaesthetic (CIILA) Reduces Postoperative Opioid Usage in Children.","authors":"Natalie Vallant, Eleftheria Xilas, Manasvi Upadhyaya","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Adequate post-operative pain relief is associated with shorter recovery time and higher patient satisfaction. Universally, opioids have been the mainstay but are associated with many adverse effects. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of Continuous Incisional Infusion of Local Anaesthetic (CIILA) for postoperative pain relief in the paediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After Trust approval for the use of CIILA was obtained, data were collected prospectively from 2019 to 2022. Patients who had previously undergone laparotomy were used as historical controls. Morphine usage, pain scores and complications were documented. Median (IQR) were quoted throughout and comparison between groups performed using a Mann-Whitney U test. p < 0.05 was accepted as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>76 cases with CIILA were included (laparotomies n = 43, renal transplants n = 33), 58 children who underwent laparotomy served as control group. Age at surgery was 9.0 years (IQR: 2.3-13.1) and 6.1 years (IQR: 2.9-10.6), respectively; p = 0.23). Total morphine usage and number of bolus doses (<48 h) were significantly less in the CIILA group [23 (IQR: 2.6-261.6) vs. 460 (IQR: 265.0-566.0) mcg/kg total, and 0.4 (IQR: 0.4-10.0) vs. 10 (IQR: 10.0-10.0) mcg/kg bolus dose respectively, both p < 0001)]. Reported pain scores were similar in both groups [1.0 (IQR: 1.0-7.0) vs 0.0 (IQR: 0.0-0.5); p = 0.13)]. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the CIILA group [(4.5 days (IQR: 3.5-6.0) vs 6.0 days (IQR: 4.0-8.0); p = 0.02)]. There were no toxicity issues nor any local infection complications reported in the CIILA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of CIILA is safe, and was associated with lower morphine consumption postoperatively. We suggest that CIILA should be more widely used in the paediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"162025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Adequate post-operative pain relief is associated with shorter recovery time and higher patient satisfaction. Universally, opioids have been the mainstay but are associated with many adverse effects. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of Continuous Incisional Infusion of Local Anaesthetic (CIILA) for postoperative pain relief in the paediatric population.

Methods: After Trust approval for the use of CIILA was obtained, data were collected prospectively from 2019 to 2022. Patients who had previously undergone laparotomy were used as historical controls. Morphine usage, pain scores and complications were documented. Median (IQR) were quoted throughout and comparison between groups performed using a Mann-Whitney U test. p < 0.05 was accepted as significant.

Results: 76 cases with CIILA were included (laparotomies n = 43, renal transplants n = 33), 58 children who underwent laparotomy served as control group. Age at surgery was 9.0 years (IQR: 2.3-13.1) and 6.1 years (IQR: 2.9-10.6), respectively; p = 0.23). Total morphine usage and number of bolus doses (<48 h) were significantly less in the CIILA group [23 (IQR: 2.6-261.6) vs. 460 (IQR: 265.0-566.0) mcg/kg total, and 0.4 (IQR: 0.4-10.0) vs. 10 (IQR: 10.0-10.0) mcg/kg bolus dose respectively, both p < 0001)]. Reported pain scores were similar in both groups [1.0 (IQR: 1.0-7.0) vs 0.0 (IQR: 0.0-0.5); p = 0.13)]. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the CIILA group [(4.5 days (IQR: 3.5-6.0) vs 6.0 days (IQR: 4.0-8.0); p = 0.02)]. There were no toxicity issues nor any local infection complications reported in the CIILA group.

Conclusion: The use of CIILA is safe, and was associated with lower morphine consumption postoperatively. We suggest that CIILA should be more widely used in the paediatric population.

连续切口输注局麻药(CIILA)可减少儿童术后阿片类药物的使用量。
目的:充分缓解术后疼痛可缩短恢复时间,提高患者满意度。在全球范围内,阿片类药物一直是主要的止痛药物,但却存在许多不良反应。我们旨在评估连续切口输注局麻药(CIILA)用于缓解儿科患者术后疼痛的安全性和有效性:在获得信托基金批准使用 CIILA 后,从 2019 年到 2022 年对数据进行了前瞻性收集。之前接受过开腹手术的患者作为历史对照。记录了吗啡用量、疼痛评分和并发症。数据均采用中位数(IQR),组间比较采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验:共纳入 76 例 CIILA 患儿(开腹手术 n = 43 例,肾移植 n = 33 例),58 例接受开腹手术的患儿作为对照组。手术年龄分别为 9.0 岁(IQR:2.3-13.1)和 6.1 岁(IQR:2.9-10.6);P = 0.23)。吗啡总用量和栓剂用量(结论:使用 CIILA 是安全的:使用 CIILA 是安全的,术后吗啡用量较少。我们建议在儿科人群中更广泛地使用 CIILA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信